(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); im wondering what is better to no scope with tell me if its a acog or no attacment give me your reason^

I heard that an acog scope does more damage so it's better for no scoping I guess. But I don't like the acog at all for snipers, on the PS3 it just shoots through people without harming them. Off course this is a friendly habit of the acog scope, but it's not what the game is about.
Btw, if you are no scoping the acog doesn't shoot through people (maybe with a lot of lagg).

Acog makes the crosshairs smaller so it would help with noscoping.

hunters right . i think

ACOG adds 5 damage, so it's a 1HKO every body part, that's why people use ACOG on no scoping montages and such so they don't get hit markers. But it still is possible if you shot through a wall or something.

And no attachment doesn't affect no scoping, and ACOG does not make the cross hairs smaller.

Yes, Kenta is right!

Also the ACOG only adds attack to the M40. So don't put it on other sniper rifles and expect 1 hit kills 100% of the time.

But, it will be a 1 hit kill every body part except the arms and legs(limbs) on the M40(no attachment), R700, and Barret .50 cal. And the Dragunov is trash, don't use it ever. M21 is good for spraying :O