(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); This video shows Medal of Honor Gameplay while talking about the differences between this game and the Call of Duty franchise.



[ame=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh19U_8p4_g]YouTube - Call of Duty VERSUS Medal of Honor[/ame]

The single player looks alright, but the Beta I played wasn't up to scratch. Even BFBC2 was better than it and it's a year older.

It felt to me like a claustrophobic, less graphically impressive version of BFBC2.
The graphics weren't as good as it, looked kind of rushed and rigid to me, and the maps were very small.

tbh once BO comes out MoH is dead

Exactly right, I have the game. The campaign is INCREDIBLE, much better than I thought. The multiplayer is a massive letdown though. Poor graphics + gameplay is a recipe for disaster in today's gaming industry :p Still, though, MoH campaign = <3

Cool thanks for the video but I see not much has changed from the closed beta like the lag kills...

black ops is way better ive played it on my jtag

to be honest i dont think, this person is actually from NGT

Something about MoH I can't quite put my finger on. It just looks so... Shitty and cheap.

It's hard to make a game comparable to the CoD series. I give MoH a high five for trying but in the end they basically made just another BfBc2.

Medal of Honor looks like they copied BFBC2 and COD.

I wouldn't mind if there was a way to get those maps on MW2 just to have something to do til BO comes out haha.

Honestly the Call of Duty Franchise is just too big right now. A game could come out and play like COD4 but with better graphics, servers, and a free lap dance and it wouldn't stack up to the COD name