(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Noticed the scores BO has been getting? its earned 3 stars on amazon which is BS. MW2 gets 9s and above even though it ****ing sucked. So why does BO get worse scores ? because MW2 was too easy. people aren't used to the fact it takes a little skill to play a game. So they blame the game by giving it shitty scores. Just wanted to point this out because BO is waaaaaaaaaay more fun then mw2 but god the gun models in BO look ****ing shit like they took them from MoH
mw2 didnt suck, it had features that were abused and i thought the campaign was fun. graphics were better and i am very skilled so i was really good at mw2. i think the low scores are BO are because it has shittier graphics then cod4 and the ps3 and pc versions are problematic and are basically works in progress.
I think Mw2 was a good idea that was abducted by a pedophile, sodomized and displayed for embarrassment. It had a lot of things that were original and fun, but in the end it became a hassle to play. It was also a lot easier of a game.
I like BO because I can have fun with it knowing a shitload of AC-130's and Chopper Gunner's aren't coming. Or that some camping noob is going to get a nuke. It has some of the same features of MW2 and then it's own unique style(Rc-xd, Napal Strike etc.).
I think BO should be rated a lot higher. Mw2 was pretty fun but we have to wait and see how Black Ops turns out.