(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Hey I thought this was a great comparisson!
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZEwTX8NL9s&feature=channel[/ame]


Many of my friends and I have been talking about whats better B 50. Cal or the intervention.

Mainly I like the intervention more because it has better accurracy-no scopeee and its bolt action + the barrett has waaaay to many hit markers, please share your opinion.

intervention definatly because of accuracy and has high damage

neither, me+M21+ACOG+stopping power=dangerous! it dominates for me. the least recoil which i find most comfortable. i could probably get as many kills as an assault rifle if i was really on top of my game and have one of those good days.

i would say its a bit underrated and actually takes quickness to get in the second shot if u are far away with the ACOG and most of the times i dont have a problem with that. i would reccomend people use this and get used to it because ive broken into it really well.

true both good arguements

yea, Barett owns those pussy juggernauts ^

bolt action doesnt cut it when going up against them.

true, if the Barett had less recoil it would be amazing. double tapping it and its over.

i do work with the intervention i get way too many hitmarkers with 50 cal...

barret all day. ovr 2500 kills and 0vr 1500 headshots, i fu*kn masterd that shiz

Barrett 50. cal Intervention gets way to many hit markers, and the scope sways sooooo muchhhhhhhhhhhhhh more than the barrett.