Post: Should MW2=Real Life?
05-03-2010, 03:08 AM #1
itzbigant91
League Champion
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); now, what if the game had everything as realistic as it gets. would u think it would be better or worse? would u play it more and think u would respect it if u dislike how the online gameplay is now? if so please elaborate.

ex. the power of the weapons (increased range on shotguns), the fact of tac insertions, the bs perks (commando) and other bs.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
05-03-2010, 03:14 AM #2
Soooo you die and you never come back and game over? Not Happy or Sad

can only get so realistic without becoming not a game
05-03-2010, 03:14 AM #3
music__MAN
Do a barrel roll!
i think it would be worse because then people can just climb out the map and snipe from very far and you would not know where they are. then everything will be in HC mode and that will also ruin the game for people that dont like HC
05-03-2010, 03:15 AM #4
It would be really really really really bad. The AA12 is real life has a range of 200 meters... in the game now its 5 meters. So 40x the range? Not to mention it would be all hardcore.
05-03-2010, 03:19 AM #5
itzbigant91
League Champion
Originally posted by tylerrau View Post
Soooo you die and you never come back and game over? Not Happy or Sad

can only get so realistic without becoming not a game


not that realistic. game wise like other online war games.

many people complain and say, ''commando is bullshit''

and then there are the people that say, ''the akimbo models' range is ridiculous.'' (pre patch) but it probably inflicts that much damage and its exact range in real life.

so its actual-factual (shotgun range, no hitmarkers for snipers) vs fiction (commando, tacs, etc.)
05-03-2010, 03:31 AM #6
jbot
Vbux are Worthless
Well wouldn't it be one shot one kill instead of hit markers? I don't think that it would be much fun. Also, people don't camp in real life, they patrol so i doubt it would even be close to being real to begin with :p
05-03-2010, 03:41 AM #7
itzbigant91
League Champion
Originally posted by jbot View Post
Well wouldn't it be one shot one kill instead of hit markers? I don't think that it would be much fun. Also, people don't camp in real life, they patrol so i doubt it would even be close to being real to begin with :p


well its a game and wouldnt expect that much lol. im talking about real life weapons, perks, tac insertions, etc. not tactics in terms of real life.

yea maybe less hitmarkers for shotguns and snipers even with silencer, definatley. like if a sniper w/ silencer was used in the single player, there wouldnt be a hitmarker right?
05-03-2010, 04:19 AM #8
Jonah Hill
No one's McLovin.
i think they need to fix somethings on this game then it would make more sence to play it.
05-03-2010, 04:21 AM #9
itzbigant91
League Champion
Originally posted by sloan View Post
i think they need to fix somethings on this game then it would make more sence to play it.


yea, mostly everyone would agree. it would become more playable and less rage quitting.
05-03-2010, 05:33 AM #10
little mroe real not to real

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo