(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Of the threads saying "MW2 was way overrated and it's such a disappointment"

When I see someone explain why it is so bad, without acting like a retard and saying it's bad because IW patched all the glitches and nerfed the 1887's, giving the other players an actual chance at killing you, instead of you getting an infinite amount of kills that take no skill whatsoever.

MW2 is bad because IW made it too complicated meaning it lacked in simplicity like World at War or Cod4.

People have been saying it's too noob friendly. How does being complicated make it noob friendly? Seems like flawed logic to me. [

in my opinion anyone who complains about the game is just crap at it.

mw2 is better than waw for alot of reasons, although i did like the bolt action rifles with no scopes on in waw

gotta put it this way, when waw was top dog (if u can call it that) alot of players prefered playing cod 4 still (NZ was the only reason why so many people still played it)

now mw2 is out, hardly anyone is playing waw, so it cant be better than waw can it?

well im not a noob at the game as I go 50+ kills every game. I just hate the noob weapons everyone uses and it takes no skill to spray and pray and rocket launch and get painkiller and kill.

unlimited grenade launchers put grenade launcher on with scavenger = noob friendly

Not true, some people just don't care for the game.

Personally i'm obviously not a god, or am I amazing at the game but I can average a 3.0 kdr, and it's too easy imo with all the noobs and such.

Then again, I can get in a game, and just get massacred because of painkiller noobs/noob tube spammers.

So I really just don't care for it as much anymore..

Its an ok game, its not that great but its not that bad either

I'm with you. COD4 was a great game IMHO. W@W was not good although I was best at that one because of the over powered MP40 & war game type. MW2 I'm ok at. I'm not the best player out there, but can hold my own.