wouldnt that be tokens > 0? since its negative

I doubt IW will actually ban people for this. It's a glitch that can legitimately happen without meaning to do it. Of course they could still ban people with a retarded amount of tokens and double xp for more time than they'll even be playing the game. But prestiging is 100% optional, they've already got to 80 and unlocked every weapon/perk before so I don't see what the problem is, it isn't "cheating" or ruining the experience for anybody else. The only thing that it slightly changes is peoples rank because of all of the double xp they're getting. But is that worse than going to wal-mart and righting down codes for double xp? No because that was taking away from others. This token glitch isn't a big deal at all. If it was up to me to patch I'd set everyone with negative tokens to 0 and remove all their double xp. Problem solved.

I aimbot, I wallhack, I used prestige token editing programs, I used programs to unlock all titles, I got every gun to gold camo, I've got 40 days of double weapon and double exp, I'm 9th prestige lvl 80, and I've got a KDR of 8.0+. I've done this throughout MW3, MW2, MW1, CSS, etc. I have never been banned. Not a single time, in any game. Never.

you really should pay more attention in class, the open end of > and < always goes towards the bigger number the way that people explained it in school a long time ago think of < as a alligator trying to reat the bigger number. with that said all they would have to do is use that < 0, meaning anything LESS than 0 ( -1, -2 ,etc).

and to think your the future of this world.... goodluck with that shit

---------- Post added at 04:19 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:16 PM ----------



You are mistaken its not just a glitch that will be looked over. It is considered a EXPLOIT because they are exploiting a glitch for personal gain, which clearly violates the EULA if any bothered to read them before agreeing to them. I'm not against glitches etc. just against the people who cry about what happens to them after thy do them.

That's becaouse Activision and their developers introduced the bans when BO came out. Banning people before then, was never a subject.

Black ops had an in-game report system, which sent a report to treyarch instead of steam/xbox. No other call of duty has an in-game report system. VAC does not ban based on reports, those are just for statistics. Not sure about xbox, but i'm sure they dont ban from reports either. Only for xbox-related hacking like gamerscore.

They ban your CD key and Steam account.

No, Activision had nothing to do with the Treyarch bans. Black Ops bans were handled by Treyarch the developers. There are no report systems and Activision doesn't care about bans in MW3.

Read, I said Activision and their developers. That dosen't even matter, Treyarch, IW and now Sledgehammer, made the previous games, so there wasn't even a chance of getting banned as they first introduced it in Black Ops. It is almost impossible to be banned from Mw2 and previous titles, they couldn't provide proof whatsoever.

Read, I said Black Ops was the only Call of Duty title to have a report option in-game. MW3 doesn't have this, meaning players cant report directly to developers, who handle bans.