(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Discuss
(10 char)

This thread spells flame war, but that's beside the point. What aspect do you want to discuss?

Your kidding right? I have and AMD. Intel was far superior.

Maybe technologically, but AMD definitily wins in the
Price-to-Performance market. And the new bulldozer platform that AMD will be revealing within the next year or so, is supposed to be quite impressive.

Price isnt a big deal if you want preformance. Intel-pay high get good tech. AMD-pay high get eh.

With AMD you dont pay high, or you can pay out the ass for intel (Which i dont mind, in some cases) and a performance increase that you wont realize in realtime, only benchmarks, unless your one of those people that try to compare something completely unfair like AMDs original single core precoessor and a 980x from intel.

i probably dont belong here, but wats the differnce between amd and intel?

The word on the street is that AMD suck ass and Intel are the best.

The word on the street is that your an Intel fanboy

AMD and Intel have not been locked in a struggle for computer processor supremacy since the beginning of time but it sure seems that way. When AMD announced a few new CPU models a week or so ago. With these new models, and Intel’s Core i3 series, there is a huge variety of choice in all price ranges. But it is particularly interesting in the $100-150 range for a number of reasons. First of all, it is a pretty good ’sweet spot’ to spend when building a new system.