(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Ok this was in response to another thread, called "creation v. evolution", but that thread is too old.

This text is taken from a site, and I will be typing inside of it as well. This mainly supports the "creation" theory, and also explains some factual inconsistencies in "Darwinian Evolution".
It's a lot to read, but it's a very informative read.

Did you know that all planets in our universe are on the exact same plane with the exception on Pluto. If one single planet's orbit were to across another planet's orbit, the entire planetary system would collapse due to the collisions. How by chance did all the planets end up on the same plane and rotating in their own orbit without crossing another planet's orbit? Pluto is the only exception. Pluto is at a 14 degree angle from the plane. Why? Because Pluto crosses 2 other orbits. If it had been on the same plane it would be on a collision course. Pluto is the signature of the Creator to prove the impossibility of chance.

Did you know that the sun is 11000 degrees. Scientist say that if the sun were to be 50 degrees hotter or colder, life on earth would cease to exist? If the earth were on a different orbit, life would not exist? Did you know that if the earth were rotating 10% slower, life would not exist? If the earth's crust were 10% shallower, life would not exist due to the molten lava below the earth's surface?

Animal evolution. Our entire evolutionary theory is based on darwin's theory. Evolution is presented as fact, but it is not widely known that these facts are built on a theory. If the theory is wrong, the facts too must be wrong. There is not one transitional fossil in a phenomenal fossil record of millions of fossils. We have fossils for every known species. The fossil record does not show any evidence for evolution, but rather it shows evidence of extinction. We have plenty of fossils pointing to animals that no longer exist, but we have nothing that links two species together. Even evolutionary scientist are abandoning the transitional theory. Schools teach what evolutionists have abandoned long ago.

Lets look at Darwin's theory. Darwin based his entire theory on one basic principle. The human cell is as simple as a glob of carbon jelly. He lived and died before the electron microscope was invented. All he could see was a nucleus, cell wall and gel. We now know that a single cell is more complex than a chemical factory. There are literally thousands of parts working together to make a cell function. It is now known that if even one of the parts of a cell was missing, the entire cell will functionally fail and thus collapse and die. This leaves evolution by chance a mathematical impossibility. Darwin could not see these functions. If he did, he would never have proposed such a theory based on simplicity. Evolutional chance is much easier to believe based on the simplicity of a ping pong ball, but chance is impossible when having the complexity of a chemical factory all work together at the exact same moment in time. Inside that cell is DNA. DNA is the code that makes life possible. It is genetic code that tells a cell how to function, how to grow, divide, repair, interact with other cells, and many other functions. Scientist say they only have very limited knowledge about the complexity of DNA. If you take all the DNA from a single cell and stretch out and lay it end to end, one cell has enough DNA to reach 7 feet. If you take all the DNA in your body and stretch it out, it would go to the moon and back 500,000 times. That is one million one-way trips to the moon. If Darwin had known this alone, would he believe in chance?

The most compelling evidence is amino acids. The simplest known living organism has over 500 amino acids. When amino acids form, they are less than one-millionth the size of a human hair. When they form, they form with side groups of atoms. Scientist have found that all non-living amino acids form with 50% of side atoms on the right side of the acid and 50% on the left. This is true on all non-living amino acids. Living cells can ONLY contain amino acids on the left side. ALL amino acids found in every single living cell contains only left-sided amino acids. In the most favorable environment of scientific labs, this has never been duplicated. No scientist has ever created the left-handed amino acid that is critical to the formation of life. All amino acids always form with left and right sided atoms. If scientist in perfect conditions can't duplicate one single left-sided amino acid, how could the 500 necessary for life form by chance? The scientific odds of even one left-sided amino acid forming by chance is 10 to the 123rd power. In other words 1 chance in 10 followed by 123 zeros. i.e. 1 in
1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Compare this to the rediculous odds of winning the lottery which is 1 chance in 80,000,000. And evolutionists say Christians have blind faith. But those are not the odds of life forming. It gets worse. That is only one of the 500 aminos necessary for the simplest life form. 20 specific aminos are needed for the simplest cell, but 500 in order for life to sustain in itself. The odds get worse. Those 500 different types of amino acids have to 'evolve' within a fraction of a millimeter of each other just to give them the chance of uniting. It gets worse. They also have to 'by chance' evolve at the exact same moment in time in a process that scientist say takes hundreds of millions of years. Elements break down the amino acids, so timing is critical. The chances of all these resources falling into place at the exact same time with the exact needed elements at the exact same place on earth within a few millionths of a millimeter of each other are 1 to the ERROR..Calculation overflow. Sorry, my Pentium doesn't have enough memory to even write the number.

~~~Knucks:
Let me clarify this last bit. There is a formula for understand the astronomical odds that amino acids (building blocks of life) could form on their own.
Take the estimated known size of the universe, which is 930 Yottameters. You then fill this space FULL of electrons, and then count said electrons. The number you end up with is the odds that amino acids would form themselves in the so called "primordial ooze" in ANY given time.
~~~~




Even if you have the phenomenal faith it takes to believe that this actually happened, the odds do not improve from here. Consider the fact than many insects have such short life spans. Some flies only live for one hour. They have less than 60 minutes to find a partner, mate, find a place to lay eggs and die. According to evolutionary scientist, the evolution process takes about 250-300 million years to occur. What is the likely hood that not one, but two of these flies would evolve within one hour of each other in a 300 million year process? So the window of evolutionary opportunity is faster than a camera shutter compared to the length of time the process takes. If that isn't enough, consider the fact that you can't both evolve with the same sex. So once again your faith is challenged with the amazing odds of having two flies with the exact same genetic make up, the exact same place on earth (within a few hundred feet - a few inches in some species) one must be male and one female, and the exact same point in history from a random 300 million year process. If you have 2 males, 2 females, or any difference in genetic make up, the critter dies and there is no second chance. This process must be duplicated for every single living thing. I haven't even factored in predators, unexpected climate changes, interdependency such as one species that can only survive by co-existing with other species (that is a huge faith challenge when you consider those odds). There are so many barriers to chance and every species must overcome the same phenomenal odds. One death and the entire process is lost.

Also, if you want to get a better understand of what real evolution is, visit this website, it has a great explanation of it:
You must login or register to view this content.


~~~End of website~~~


Another interesting thing that I recently learned, that shatters the idea of Darwin's theory of evolution, is the discovery of the difference between two small bones in human and ape skeletons.

I know what you're thinking, "two small bones"? What difference does that make? Well...

You must login or register to view this content.

The Trochlea Tali, see it? That bone sits forward in human feet, and reversed in ape feet (or hands if you like). What's the difference?

This is an ape's foot, it's hard to see the difference of the two bones really...
You must login or register to view this content.


ANYWAYS, here's the difference. Only the bone found in the human foot supports Bi-pedal Locomotion, or Walking upright. It is specifically designed for something to walk on TWO LEGS.

The same bone, found in ape's feet, sits reversed, which doesn't supports bi-pedal locomotion, but quadra-pedal locomotion, or walking on all fours.

Here's another interesting fact, there are no transitional fossils or skeletal remains showing an ape with the human bone, or a human with the ape bone in the foot.

"What about Ida?" Well, yes, "ida" the supposed "missing link" DOES have this bone. But it sits the wrong way, in fact Ida's trochlea tali sits upside down, meaning it's made for hanging upside down from trees. Much like the OTHER LEMUR SKELETONS SIMILAR TO IDA'S.


OK so that's it for now, have at it.

Ahh, looking for a reason to believe in the old man hovering in the skies?

No I just hate Evolutionist HAHAHAHA

I do find it interesting, all the coincidences...

You must login or register to view this content.

So someone who was created, created the Earth and galaxies and vast emptiness that is space just to have life on Earth. He was also a genius and knew the exact space needed, temperature needed, the right speed, the right depth etc right? Why did The Creator(Fitting nickname eh?) make other planets/galaxies etc yet Earth is the only planet in this Galaxy with intelligent life? Other worldly intelligent life forms have yet to be found/contacted. How would this creator be able to defy science and move planets that are thousands of times bigger/heavier then a man?

If you think your so smart why cant you see that religion was created by humans...thats what I will never learn, people go out of their way to prove that God is right but they cant see that its all made up. My friend believes in God, only thing he talks about is god, he has had like 5 concussions, 6 broken bones and has asthma. God is really on his side...

Pluto is not a planet...I just disproved the theory using the first sentence.

You must login or register to view this content.
Where is your source???

But did he survive or is he dead?

Hes a alive, but he has a horrible life, he has lots of allergy's and has something that makes his bones dislocate all the time, his ribs dislocate and his jaw also.