Post: Double jeopardy law will be scrapped in Scotland
08-16-2010, 12:44 AM #1
NeedaMilfSoon
In my man cave
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); The Scottish government is to propose a change in the law which would scrap the controversial double jeopardy law.

The law prevents a person standing trial twice for the same crime.

Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill launched a consultation on the issue in March following a recommendation by the Scottish Law Commission.

Scrapping the law could lead to convicted killer Angus Sinclair standing trial for a second time over the World's End murders.

BBC Scotland understands the government's bill will go further than the law commission's recommendation that only people cleared of murder and rape should be allowed to stand trial for a second time.

Instead, it will be extended to cover other offences including some serious sexual crimes and culpable homicide.
Convicted killer

And the government intends to make the changes retrospective, which would open the way for retrials when new and compelling evidence becomes available.

There is cross-party support at Holyrood for abolishing the law, as happened in England and Wales five years ago.

Sinclair had the charges against him thrown out three years ago after a judge ruled there was insufficient evidence that he had raped and murdered teenagers Christine Eadie and Helen Scott in 1977.

However, police and relatives of Ms Scott and Ms Eadie remain convinced of his guilt. The family of Ms Scott has welcomed the government's move to abolish double jeopardy for the most serious offences.

Mr MacAskill had previously said the World's End case had "scarred the soul of Scotland".

Source: You must login or register to view this content.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
08-16-2010, 04:07 AM #2
I never liked double jeopardy tbh. I know it could be viewed as targeting a person but if there is legitimate new evidence to introduce it should be retried in court. We allow appeals for those found guilty when new evidence is discovered, the same should hold true for the "innocent".

Cool Man (aka Tustin)
08-16-2010, 04:25 AM #3
NeedaMilfSoon
In my man cave
Originally posted by longjohnsilver View Post
I never liked double jeopardy tbh. I know it could be viewed as targeting a person but if there is legitimate new evidence to introduce it should be retried in court. We allow appeals for those found guilty when new evidence is discovered, the same should hold true for the "innocent".

Cool Man (aka Tustin)


I totally agree man. I mean if new evidence is found then the person should be allowed to be tried again.

But I find it funny how if you are said to have killed someone but really you did not and they find you guilty but the person is still alive, you are allowed to go kill that person after you are out of prison and you cannot be tried again. I mean it is unfair but in a sense funny and interesting.

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo