Originally posted by TairyHesticles
I can't remember the name of the bill, but the one that's been floating around Congress making it to where you can't post more then 10 videos of Copyrighted material within 6 months or something along the lines of that. Now everyone has been flipping shit lately because they think Machinima and the entire YouTube gaming community will be ****ed. This is not the case at all.
Worst case scenario, let's say the bill passes. Gaming companies like us putting videos of the game up, it's like free advertising to them .If the didn't like it they would have stopped it over 2 years ago when it started. On every game you see a FBI Warning thin saying you can't make copies of the game, resell it for profit, etc. When it passes they will probably write a new disclaimer saying that when you buy the game you have the right to post videos of it but not to resell it or make copies, or they might say it's OK to make videos and they won't press charges. IF they don't do any of that, they will definitely work something out with Machinima and YouTube partners to where it's okay for them to post videos. The little guys 'might' get f*cked over on it but everyone else should be fine.
This law applies more to TV shows, movies, and music.
Bottom line. Gaming videos make games more money. Game developers like money, and they will allow the gaming videos to keep getting posted.
Bill S.978 is the bill you speak of.
Here's the problem.
Originally posted by another user
‘(2) shall be imprisoned not more than 5 years, fined in the amount set forth in this title, or both, if--
‘(A) the offense consists of 10 or more public performances by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copyrighted works; and
‘(B)(i) the total retail value of the performances, or the total economic value of such public performances to the infringer or to the copyright owner, would exceed $2,500; or
‘(ii) the total fair market value of licenses to offer performances of those works would exceed $5,000;’; and
(2) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (2) and inserting the following:
‘(2) the terms ‘reproduction’, ‘distribution’, and ‘public performance’ refer to the exclusive rights of a copyright owner under clauses (1), (3), (4), and (6), respectively of section 106 (relating to exclusive rights in copyrighted works), as limited by sections 107 through 122, of title 17;’.
It doesn't matter if they like it or it makes them money. The gaming companies have
No Say whatsoever. You need to obtain legal permission (Hell, knowing this government, legal document) to have fair use of whatever is in question to infringe copyright. It doesn't matter what the companies say, if they government sees that you used something without documentation, they will chase you. A disclaimer won't probably work. It hasn't worked on Piracy, and it probably won't work here. This is the problem with it. If the bill passes, the government has control of this kind of media, how the companies sees it will not be accounted for.
It's not how the companies feel, it's our he government feels.