Videos of blasts that could easily have resulted from debris, gas lines, or water lines. Yeah bro, that totally means that the media has ever told us is a lie, and that the Illuminati runs the government, and that the moon landing is fake :dumb:
Im tired of finding all the proof and show it to a stranger on the internet.
Watch the movie: Loose Change
They explain everything correctly, one for instance:
"Between September 6 and 7, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 put options on United Airlines, but only 396 call options… Assuming that 4,000 of the options were bought by people with advance knowledge of the imminent attacks, these “insiders” would have profited by almost $5 million.
- On September 10, 4,516 put options on American Airlines were bought on the Chicago exchange, compared to only 748 calls. Again, there was no news at that point to justify this imbalance;… Again, assuming that 4,000 of these options trades represent “insiders,” they would represent a gain of about $4 million."
Just watch the movie THEN come back here.
I will even be nice and provide you with the video
The following user thanked IDontbreak for this useful post:
Do you realize the force of a HUGE airplane hitting that builiding? If that plane had NO gas in it the towers would still have a similiar reaction. There is such an intense amount of heat and pressure upon impact causing everything that it touches to burn very quickly. When an airplane crashes it EXPLODES. SIMPLE. That amount of heat and pressure with the burning jet fule ontop of that would cause the towers to collapse. I think that the terrorists could have planted bombs to make sure they collapsed and used the airplanes to instill fear into people when they fly, therefore being successfull as a terrorist.
I knew that Loose Change bollox was going to appear :n:
Here's some CopyPasta for the OP to choke/chew on :puke:
So how did they get the 1000's of FBI agents, Firefighters, Demolition experts, Scientists, CIA, Police, Rescue workers, airline pilots, the majority of House of Representatives, air traffic controllers, military contractors and the entire Bush administration to keep it a secret?
Further Reading:
For anyone interested in a point-by-point debunking of some of the most popular conspiracy theories out there (like the fact that steel melts at 1525° C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825° C, it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C),
I guess you assume that building didn't have any gas lines running through it huh?
Who the hell are you?
Youre not an acrhitect, you dont understand the infrastructure.
1500 EXPERIENCED Architectures and engineers came down with the conclusion that the WTC 7 building was taken down by a controlled demoliton charge.
And another argument, Why arent there any proof of the pentagon "Plane" crash?
The worlds most advanced defence building couldnt even provide 1 Video footage?
---------- Post added at 11:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 PM ----------
Originally posted by I
I knew that Loose Change bollox was going to appear :n:
Here's some CopyPasta for the OP to choke/chew on :puke:
So how did they get the 1000's of FBI agents, Firefighters, Demolition experts, Scientists, CIA, Police, Rescue workers, airline pilots, the majority of House of Representatives, air traffic controllers, military contractors and the entire Bush administration to keep it a secret?
Further Reading:
For anyone interested in a point-by-point debunking of some of the most popular conspiracy theories out there (like the fact that steel melts at 1525° C, and although jet fuel burns only at 825° C, it doesn't have to burn hot enough to melt to cause the buildings to collapse, since steel loses 50% of its strength at 648 ° C),
I feel sorry for you. You are so uneducated about the matter it makes me sick.
Do you even know what kind of impact this tower was made to handle? A ****ing Cessna plane. Do you know how big those are? Search them up on Google. This was like 5x bigger than that and carried WAY more fuel. And if you had any common sense, you would realize that if a tower was sliced in half, the top part would collapse on the bottom part making the bottom part become weaker, thus making the tower collapse in a straight manner.
The fact that you think this is funny is sickening. People died. I'd imagine that one of your family member's didn't die did they? If they did you wouldn't be sitting here laughing. Trust me.
And apparently we are brainwashed because we choose not to trust the media, and trust what we see with our own eyes. Plus, a -100x-200 resolution video means nothing to me right now, and I feel sorry if you believe that over what you saw that day.
The following 4 users say thank you to Millz for this useful post:
Who the hell are you?
Youre not an acrhitect, you dont understand the infrastructure.
1500 EXPERIENCED Architectures and engineers came down with the conclusion that the WTC 7 building was taken down by a controlled demoliton charge.
And another argument, Why arent there any proof of the pentagon "Plane" crash?
The worlds most advanced defence building couldnt even provide 1 Video footage?
---------- Post added at 11:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:32 PM ----------
Even if the Steal weakens Why the hell would it collapse?
Look at my provided videos in the OP instead.
And once again, WHY ARENT THEIR ANY PROOF OF THE PENTAGON CRASH?!