(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); i think war is somethig thats needed to keep balence i think there is no way to keep control with out fighting

this is how i see it lets say someone is stealing from you how are you going to stop them?? are you going to say "hey stop" and expect them to stop or are you going to take charge and defend whats yours??

another example lets say one country is doing somethig bad like killing people what can you do point a finger at them and say stop?? no i understand you could stop tradeing with that country but money is money and there is always another country willing to trade with you but if you defend those people the country thats killing theam will back off.

but thats how i see it what do you think??

and i dont want this to turn into a anti america thing so keep it clean

Well, war does keep everything balanced, but I don't think that people have to die to keep people from killing people. Countrys should be more mature instead of saying "We're going to bomb your country".

yea i dont belive in blood shead for no reson but the rong people have to much power

I believe that if a country is commiting "genocide", then other countries have a right to go and protect those people. E.g. Rwanda 1994. Within 100 days an estimated 800,000 - 1,000,000 men, women and children were hacked to death with machettes. If the UN had acted on this then far less lives would be lost. But the UN intervening could be seen as an "occupation" or a "war". This is situation where war could be justified.

The occupation of iraq by the British and American forces which was started by the retard bush is a war that cannot be justified. They aint got no weapons of mass destruction but they do have a hell loada oil. All theyre doin there is killing innocent people, as the brits did in the north of ireland in the 1970s/80s and 90s

number 1: you cant not have war. you would think people would be mature, but if you actually go to the middle east or a similar country (yes i have been), you realize they do not negotiate. they feel they are correct for everything. that the other side should give them everything.

as for the iraq war that was dumb as hell except for 1 thing. saddam killed millions of people that simply did not agree with him. and people over there are very happy that they have freedoms they never thought they would have, regardless of what biased media will have you believe

I disagree with the concept of war entirely. Cooperation and tolerance need to be seen as alternatives. In this day and age, we actually have the potential to end the human species. The choice is peace or extinction.

too bad other countries cant be mature enough. which is why war is needed. it doesnt matter if you agree with it or not. nobody WANTS war. its just something that has to be. i'm sure everybody here would agree war is a terrible thing. but sadly its the only thing that works

cold war anyone?
in the first few months maybe years the cold war resulted in no deaths...

the cold war wasn't actually a war.

yea it wasent a war it was more like a stand off the sovits knew we could blow them off the map but they could have done the same to us