Originally posted by Just4Hax
So you think sites like NGU, Youtube, Google, etc... should suffer for their users?
YouTube would not suffer, as it has procedures that openly oppose and attempt to prevent illegal Internet activity, like taking down videos, complying with a company's copyright claims, etc. Considering this, it would not be a target of SOPA, because its ultimate use is not what SOPA is against, piracy.
The problem with SOPA is that its definition of piracy is vague, and websites like Wikipedia could get in trouble for simply having information that has been "copyrighted", which I don't understand how you can pirate information because information is free, but according to our oh-so-intelligent government, you can. And it's not only America's that seems to think that.
Google wouldn't suffer, either. Google itself doesn't condone piracy or other illegal Internet activity, either, especially considering they own YouTube. The only thing Google would have to do is prevent the website that has been charged from appearing on search results. So, in a sense, only we suffer because I doubt Google cares about ThePirateBay.org or Megaupload's existence. At most, it would make Google have to do more work.
SOPA could eventually lead to Internet censorship, so there's another reason it can't be passed. SOPA is a gateway bill to Internet restriction, but is not in itself Internet restriction. That's more of a PIPA incentive.
NGU openly condones piracy and other illegal activity in its Premium Forums, but it doesn't necessarily actually host anything illegal itself -- it allows its users to, therefore is a valid target of SOPA, and other laws that are already in place. Outsider and the other administrators are aware of this, and know that they could get in trouble for it, if SOPA in its original state is ever passed. (Which it will hopefully never be.) So, if they do, the only thing that could have been done is not allowing illegal activity in the first place. If it's taken down and people are arrested, so be it. We all knew it was possible, even before SOPA.
I don't support SOPA or PIPA, but I also don't think that everyone who against it necessarily knows what it is so it's kind of pointless for them to oppose it. I applaud you for at least pointing out a section to support your argument, as most haven't even read the first sentence. I just can't say I agree with your interpretation.
In all, there's no reason SOPA should pass, and I'm glad it's been "put up on the shelf" for now, but now comes PIPA, which is even worse, so hopefully it isn't passed either.