Originally posted by glitchplz
You continue to avoid my point. I never said it is a stroll in the park but it is not as difficult as K2.
No-one cares... seriously. You're trying to prove a point that doesn't need proving...
Originally posted by glitchplz
I would never have someone such as you as my role model, I require a role model who is successful. I've lost yet proven you wrong? Your logic is broken sir. I will make sure to return the favor. You continue to show your immaturity.
You've lost because the contention wasn't about mountains, it was about debate etiquette, personal attacks, and your assessment of my character. I don't give a shit about the mountains, let it drop, I've already agreed with you about 4 posts ago you dumb shit... the reason I'm treating you like the pathetic little troll you've become is because you haven't the faintest clue how to conduct yourself in a discussion or debate and as a result have only made yourself look like an idiot despite you originally being right.
You actually LOST a debate even though you where RIGHT! Do you see how pathetic that is?
If you'd calmly and casually just linked to a mountain climbers website, or magazine etc. anything that rates the difficulty of climbs for example, and said, "look these guys say Kilimanjaro is actually a much easier climb than you're claiming", I'd have said "Oh, right, fair enough, they probably know what they're talking about, I guess it's not as hard as I originally thought", and that would have been it. And even then you still haven't won, because really that's just an argument from authority, a logical fallacy by definition. Just because some mountain climbers agree with you doesn't automatically make you right, however as it was a casual comment I'd be willing to accept a reasonable argument from authority, because really we were only discussing in passing something both subjective, and that neither of us have done or are ever likely to do.
Instead of doing what I said you acted like a cock, made more assertions; first that I was wrong in the God vs. Fact thread, and second that I post quantity over quality, both of which are provably false, and effectively you destroyed yourself by showing you can't form a string of coherant logic. After those screw ups you went on to insult me, both passively and directly, because we all know you win the argument by mocking the cripple for his genetic disorder and the fact that he's unemployed only a week after he's been legally deemed unfit for work... sure, that's on about the same level as mocking a women for not being a mother shortly after hearing about her miscarriage. Taste and decency for you are just words aren't they.
This is why you lose, because it's not always about who's right and whos wrong, especially when it's a casual throw-away comment, it's about presenting yourself as a decent, but rational human being. I always win debates, because if I'm wrong I'm only wrong for a few seconds, because once I've been given reason to change my position I do so instantly and without issue. K2 is the hardest mountain to climb, or so I'm lead to believe, so what? Does it really matter? The point is, while I haven't won any debate... you have lost. You've lost your dignity, your integrity, and the respect of me and your peers here on NGU, don't believe me? Ask -Grumpy- or Just4Hax who came out worse here.
Edit: BTW your -repping me back doesn't even come close to stinging. You have a rep power of 9... a single "Thanks" will undo that. Congratulations on your ineffectual flailing.