Originally posted by F
On July 4th, 2012, ENZO, INC filed a suit against DAVE., LTD; including it's officers, directors,
partners, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, subsidiaries, and those acting in concertwith any of them for the damages inflicted to the NextGenUpdate postbit for a period of over 24 hours. These damages caused harm to the NextGenUpdate community, with vBPlaza information, gaming information, contact information and, to some extent, the general information of each user. ENZO, INC has included Exhibit A, Exhibit B and Exhibit C as evidence of the actions by DAVE. LTD, that ultimately resulted in damages to the postbit.
I . EVIDENCEI. EXHIBIT A
You must login or register to view this content.
An image displaying Dave, userid 137399, creating and manipulating plugin 6041 multiple times.
II. EXHIBIT B
You must login or register to view this content.
An image of plugin 6041, that was created by Dave. This shows the plugin was intended to impact on the postbit.
III. EXHIBIT C
You must login or register to view this content.
A syntax check of pluign 6041, showing that it was not function at time of creation.
ENZO, INC is motioning to receive damages from having to find the cause and repair the issues created by DAVE., LTD in the amount of $80,000 and requests that the other side, DAVE., LTD; it's officers, directors,
partners, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, subsidiaries, and those acting in concert with any of them, cover the $20,000 in legal fees faced by ENZO, INC.
Originally posted by Dave
Under Section 918.13 of the Statue Title XLVII, the tampering of evidence defined as the 'destruction,
alteration, removal or
concealment of objects, records or documents marked as evidence'. The statue does require that the tampering of the evidence is 'intentional, with the purpose of making the evidence unavailable or
impairing its value in court'.
The defence feels the deliberate removal of ENZO, INC from the administrator archive qualifies directly as a 'concealment of objects'.
Section 918.13 makes it a crime to 'present any objects, records or documents marked as evidence knowing that evidence is false'.
The defence demands that all evidence presented be ceased from the trial at once. We also ask that the original source code which has
not been tampered with by the prosecutor, be taken into account, which has been verified by many syntax checkers as perfectly fine:
You must login or register to view this content.
The defence also questions whether the minimum age requirement to testify in court is being enforced.
We find Dave.....guilty of all charges and is here by fined 20,000 dollars for court cost and have 90 days to to pay the Plaintiff 100,000 dollars to cover court cost and damages.