(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I have seen a need for this arousing, as many refuse to give even remote CnC. I would like to thank The-Unknown for giving what i consider the most in depth CnC here. Even though Gourav has a post on "How to Properly Rate Work" this will be much more in depth and focused on CnC.

- How is the quality of the render. Does it feel in proportion? Is the quality just not fitting. Is the render placed properly? Is it blended, too much, too little, or none at all.


- How is the lighting if any? Is the lighting minimal? Is there a light source but no light on the render? Or vice-versa.


- Is there depth to the work? Or was the concept just ignored? What could add more depth?

- How is the flow? Did the artist just slap the render and other pieces together with no certain direction of movement? Or did they think it through and add flow to the work?

- Is the background matching with the render? Do they blend together? Or does the render/background stand out?

- How is the brushing? If any, does it flow with the work, or feel out of place. Does it blend?

- How is the C4D usage? Are the c4d's properly placed and blended? Do they match the flow of the work?

-Is the text placed properly, or does it feel out of place and not part of the render? Is the font choice appropriate?

-Do the overall colors match the portrayed mood of the work? Or are they out of the appropriate spectrum?

- How is the usage of the various adjustment layers? Gradient maps, exposure etc. Are they used effectively or sloppily placed on with no predetermined effect desired?

-How is the contrast? Is the work going all over the light and dark spectrum, or does it maintain a constant theme?

-Is the work over-sharpened, blurred, or just right?

- How is the smudging, if any? Is it overdone? Does it follow the flow of the rest of the work? Or is it just placed on for the sake of it being there?

- Is the work aesthetically pleasing? Is it nice too look at, a work can be composed right, but because of how it formed, it becomes unattractive.

Now let's see some good CnC!

Where did you copy and paste this from?

TBH, myself. I copy pasted this from another forum I'm on, MPGH. I mean like, I saw here that no one posted a thread about something like this. They should know how to CnC.
I'm being totally honest here.

You should give credit in the post if you copy pasted.

As I said.
I copy pasted MYSELF.

Dude calm down.
Nobody is ****ing saying anything bad.

The Graphics forum is Chill.

either put up work or GTFO. :y:

---------- Post added at 10:17 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:14 PM ----------

oh and btw... I used "The Plagiarism Checker"...

I hope you are "PhotoNoobster via MPGH" ....

Cant put link in here. Thanks Pure Decimation


-____- ..

Rule 1 of NGU.

Don't lie or take credit for others doing.

I recommend removing that link, as it is to another forum and its just going to get removed anyway.

I think you need to read the posts above before commenting./facepalm

I think its a sure bet that this user did actually write this on another forum and thus does not need to credit himself.
I've seen the OP's posts before hand and the amount of detailed CnC he gives would support what he is saying to be true.

I think people need to stop "jumping the gun" everytime a non premium with few posts posts anything worthwhile onsite.:confused:

Edit: After reading some of the OP's other posts this thread seems a bit hypocritical.

If I took time in each of my CnC, then it would sound better. But when I rush it because I need to, it'll sound very harsh.

Sorry if it offended you or anything. I'll think about what I post next time. I'll try to be... more detailed

Sorry to quote you on this one but I wanted you to definately get the message.

Work on this thread using BB Code and improve it with more detail if you can.

Or even consider using images as examples and such and this could find itself to become a sticky. :y:

Any problems let me know.

You must login or register to view this content.