(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); People say it doesn't matter. Those people are in denial because they're bad. I would say a good benchmark KD is 2.50+ with a decent amount of playtime. People with higher KD's live longer getting more flags/defends and don't cause your team as much tickets. What would you say is a good KD?

that's just for conquest... you gotta remember there's 8 or 9 other game modes and if you play a bunch like TDM, Rush, Obliteration, CTF a good KD should be in the 1.5-1.9 range simply because of how tight those maps are. Mine would be 1.7 right now but i'm in the process of getting the UMP9... so yea buhbye KD

well according to what i see like in general (doesn't apply to everybody though) people with such high KDRs dont play the objectives....like when you go on conquest or rush or whatever and only goal to get kills....i hardly have a 0.8 kdr and i usually am the top or one of the top players in the game wrt the scores so yeah in bf4 what makes you like considered better is the score/min not the kdr :/ just an opinion

Given the average K.D is 0.68 I would say above 1.

Is that seriously the average for the BF4 player? How was it you found that out? (I do believe you, just thought it would be like 0.80-0.90 as average) Pretty crazy when you take the guys with 5-6 kds into proportion.

To be considered a good player a good KD for playing conquest would be around 2.5 and above, simply because in a vehicle you barely die, and good one for playing smaller gamemodes would be 3 and above, note that if by good you meant an average player then 1 and above is good for everything.

I agree with Shadow. I'd always class 1 and up alright.

Over a 1+ K/D is decent I guess.
For me to think you're good would have to be a 1.90+
Just my opinion though.

I like to keep mine over 2.0.