(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
A work in progress of cfw 4.21 is on its way as a example multiman setups for 4.21 cfw.... You must login or register to view this content.
, but what i want to know is do any of you truly think its even needed.
If you choose 3.55 over 4.21 what is it that you possible loose to gain a higher firmware? my thoughts come to alot of apps and pkgs that worked on 4.21 will possibly no longer work since its not signed for 4.21, examples possible lost of FSM unless you have a e3 flasher to modify your nor to get in it. also the thoughts of remarrying a bluray and also access to qa flags. these are some of what come to my mind since they are only signed for 3.55.
I just want to hear more if you all believe this is even good or bad to do. Remember this will most likely to still give you no PSN unless a bypass is available to use.
Yes but as we see, the e3 team are helping us and making the eboots and the other things(to early to remember) to let us play the games on the lower firmware(3.55/3.41) look at all the games on ps3iso website. A million links for games to dl to use on the cfw. Most allow the use of online.look at mw3
Yes but as we see, the e3 team are helping us and making the eboots and the other things(to early to remember) to let us play the games on the lower firmware(3.55/3.41) look at all the games on ps3iso website. A million links for games to dl to use on the cfw. Most allow the use of online.look at mw3
the only thing 4.21cfw would be useful for is getting info on new games and auth key,then making a method to downgrade without hardware maybe disable the second metldr
the only thing 4.21cfw would be useful for is getting info on new games and auth key,then making a method to downgrade without hardware maybe disable the second metldr
you can still get any file from any game. you can put mw3 in a 3.55 multiman, goto file manager and still get all the files off the disc and with all the eboots out, whats the point of 4.21? (which in my opinion is bullshit)
The following user thanked Masta-blasta117 for this useful post: