Post: SCEA Files Motion To Dismiss OtherOS Lawsuit Again
04-03-2011, 10:05 PM #1
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
You must login or register to view this content.


Originally posted by another user
There’s news from the class action litigation, In re Sony PS3 ‘Other OS’ Litigation, where the plaintiffs are suing Sony Computer Entertainment America for removing OtherOS from Playstation 3s. SCEA has filed another motion to dismiss [PDF] the class action case, once again saying that the plaintiffs’ newly filed First Amended Complaint is insufficient to state a claim. The original complaint’s claims, except for one, were dismissed, with the judge giving the plaintiffs a chance to refile. Now that they have, SCEA says this refiled complaint should be tossed out also. There will be a hearing on all this on May 12th.


And the class action plaintiffs are asking the judge [PDF] to help them get discovery that SCEA is, they claim, reluctant to provide. Role reversal. In the SCEA v. Hotz litigation, SCEA is all about discovery, all they can get. Here, it’s the opposite.
There is a transcript from a February 9th hearing in the Sony class action attached as an exhibit to the plaintiffs’ letter to the judge in the case, and I think you’ll be amazed. Would you like to know what SCEA’s lawyers think of customers who use Linux? We get to find out, because the hearing begins with SCEA asking the judge for access to the plaintiffs’ hard drives. Why would you want that, the judge asks? These are not defendants accused of anything, remember. Sony is the one in the hot seat, but here is the incredible answer: because, says their attorney, these plaintiffs say they used Linux, so SCEA suspects they were part of a hacking conspiracy, and they’d like to check. There’s more, and I’ll tell you all about it.


And SCEA claims in the transcript that it wasn’t the entity that decided to drop OtherOS. It says in this courtroom that Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. is responsible for that decision. In Hotz, SCEA says it is responsible for pretty much everything to do with PS3s in the US, or at least I got that impression. SCEA also tells the judge at the hearing that there’s been a change in the corporate setup. SCEI isn’t the parent of SCEA any more. So I did a little research on that. Who are they then? And how how were they related? I have found some press releases that clarify very nicely.


Source:
You must login or register to view this content.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
04-03-2011, 10:14 PM #2
boss10000
Like A.....
So people complain about Sony removing OS which hardly anyone used, and then they buy 3-4 ps3's to hack them, instead of just buying a bloody PC and get over it.

The following user thanked boss10000 for this useful post:

SmokingBanana
04-03-2011, 10:29 PM #3
Originally posted by boss10000 View Post
So people complain about Sony removing OS which hardly anyone used, and then they buy 3-4 ps3's to hack them, instead of just buying a bloody PC and get over it.


Haha i agree with you, i own 1 ps3 and 2 pc's lol
04-04-2011, 02:48 AM #4
thorn
Gym leader
its retarded how sony can dismiss such a thing that was promised as a selling point also the new ToS state that YOU do not own your ps3 console
04-04-2011, 05:03 AM #5
Can someone explain, what does this mean?
04-04-2011, 01:47 PM #6
xXZOHAN8Xx
Do a barrel roll!
Originally posted by xVzS
Can someone explain, what does this mean?


Technically you do own your PS3 just Sony own the firmware and other stuff that you use, so they are claiming it is theirs by you using all of their things they put in. It is probably against the terms and conditions to do stuff like modifying and releasing of modified PS3 consoles and firmware. So if you go and change something that someone else owns (Sony FW) they can sue you or whatever.
I am not against hacking/modifying this is just sort of explaining to you what it means.
    https://www.youtube.com/user/xXCoDvidzXx

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo