(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

fuck call of duty. these are two very different games. cod ghost is for 12 year olds and faggots, battlefield 4 is for people over the age of 12 and not faggots. you just cant compare these games but yes, call of duty will sell way more world wide because, well its call of duty, doesnt have to be good to sell. havent people leaned that by now?

You can't compare a Battlefield to a Fucking CoD Game. Like Masta said CoD's are for Milk drinking Kids which reports you because you are better than all those fucking sniper campers. So, whit this conclusion there is no reason to compare Battlefield with CoD. Battlefield is unique and awesome!

COD4 is better than both.

Call of Duty to Battlefield is like Need for Speed to Gran Turismo.

COD Ghosts will win.
As it always does.

I for one enjoy each Call of Duty every year. Although my play time is less for each COD, I still enjoy a new campaign and a fresh start at online play. Say what you want, I play both Black Ops II and Battlefield 3 and I enjoy both. But you guys are right, you can't be comparing the two like they are the same. The play style is much different between the two. I have also noticed that there are a lot more generally skilled players on Battlefield 3, due to an actual need for strategy. Either way, I will be picking up both, along with GTA V this fall.

Both great games but I will get cod ghost before bf4

The Call of Duty vs Battlefield debate is just never going to end, yet people do not realize these two games CANNOT be compared gameplay wise! One might find the other more fun than the other.

Call of Duty is well known for its system with quick games. True, the younger crowd does tend to play this more than Battlefield, but it is still a fun game to play. So many people complain about 12 year olds cursing over the mic. Guess what, people, there is a freaking mute button, not only that, there is a MUTE ALL BUT PARTY button! I don't know why people think it's still an issue. If you're tired of hearing ten year olds, then MUTE THE LOBBY.

Regarding Battlefield, it is a very different game. First of all, the maps are much larger and there are vehicles. I do like Battlefield a lot more for this, but the games tend to be a lot longer, depending on the game mode. It is a game that requires team work, yet no one complains about 12 year olds cursing, but I have definitley run into a few on PSN.

Which game is right for you is up to you, not the rest of the world. If you want to get COD for its fast action then get COD. If you want to get Battlefield for its vehicles, large maps, and destructible environments, then get Battlefield. If you want and can afford to have the best of both worlds, then more power to you.

It'd be great if people would stop complaining about COD being taken over by kids, because millions of people play it and not all of them are little kids.

Is there a reason to like COD more than Batlefield? Come on, COD can't compete. Their old-ass engine cannot catch up, let alone stand against BF.... Battlefield rapes COD in every single way.