(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); The only beta that either IW or Terarch has had was Treyarch's World At War(There was one for Cod4, But it was not online and only on 360). I think it would have been/would be cool if there was/is a closed multiplayer beta for those who pre-ordered this game, B.O. II. Maybe it could run from October 1st to October 30th. And that way players could play it and give feedback back to Devs on issues like glitches, "OP" guns, "UP" guns, "OP" Perks, etc.Then that way as the beta trial goes on devs can work on improving the feedback they get from beta testers that way by launch date, a lot, but not all, of those problems that always come with a CoD game may be reduced.

Then when it releases, all the beta testers rank, etc. are reset with everyone else.

Anyone agree/disagree?

Not really they test the games in private and have people to find bugs in there studio..That is more than likely the finished game but obviously they may make a few adjustments

What is the point in a beta when the game is so small?

All CODs have a beta just not public it private and closed.
IF they did a beta i would like to be part of the private beta. Over the recent trend of betas which are demos but we going to call them betas.

Shame you can't update betas in real time but that the problem of having a game on console i guess.

I would love access to a beta if i could talk to the devs about it and things got changed. Or i could hear the reasons behind certain decisions.

To give feedback on glitches etc....

---------- Post added at 12:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 AM ----------


Well yea I know that, But I mean a beta for us the consumer as well. There will be things that devs may miss that the consumer will notice.

I Would love to see a beta for BO2 but i dont think so . otherwise it would be great