(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); After jumping on the MSMC bandwagon I've noticed this.

Not aesthetically the same, but the damage, rate of fire, recoil, hipfire, and even the sound makes me think these guns are a lot alike.

Or am I the only one? :evil:

I've also noticed this, one of the main reasons I use it a lot.

Rapid Fire is virtually useless on this game. I was a big Rapid Fire SMG guy on MW3 but BO2's rapid fire's range is within like 5 feet. Any range longer than that it pretty much doesn't work. In years past rapid fire only added to recoil but this year it decreases range.

i still get beaten by people using the pdw.

i like the msmc but it feels slower than the pdw also

The recoil is only difference I have noticed may be that I don't use grip. Otherwise it is very similiar.

Pretty much....

i definatly think that

Never thought about it, but it kinda does.

that's an excellent comparison. this gun never fails me in game battles, I never lose when using it. very reliable


grip + extended mag = Jesus in your hands