(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Treyarch Rip off

When i saw that s-there are new camo's on on Black Ops 2 i tought it's cool they made it
A few second later i saw that the camo's aren't free ?
I don't why Treyarch do this but Why should you pay to get a new camo on a game where the developers even didn't give a shit making it :/
I hope that someone agree's with me that it's a rip off
Offcourse there will be people that will say that it's fun to have new one but I don't get it why they ask 1.82€ For a simple camo ;/

Lets put this in nice big text so you can read it:

YOU DON'T HAVE TO BUY THEM!

I'm getting fed up of seeing people complaining about something which they don't even have to buy.
Its optional, if you want to buy new camo, you can, if you don't want to, don't buy them, its simple as that.

At the end of the day, they know people will buy them, so why not make money off them?
It's a clever move.

Thank you , atleast some people understand.Thankfully it's just a camo and not something that will effect the game like a over powered weapon or equipment of sort.Although i do agree with the people who said that it should have been free /partly free for those who have season pass but that might be just because i'm a little biased.

It's definitely a rip off because even people that got the season pass they didn't get it free, which is messed up.

I agree there truly money whores.

Treyarch doesn't care about their members anymore, all they care is about money.

I agree it shouldn't be that much for 1 camo. They just want money, SMH.

I don't think it's a ripoff. I will say though I initially heard $1.99 and thought "oh that's not bad at all" although it's literally $1.99 per camo which when you think about it is $18 if you bought them all.

So like I said in another thread it's basically a smart business decision, a cool edition to add to the game AND a money hungry thing to do all at once lol.

Since it's $1.99 each I would only by one because that All About the Benjamins pack money sign emblem would go great when I put on my FAL or SWAT class occasionally. A lot of the reticules only noobs would be using because they obscure the hell out of your view.

Ripoff is a strong term. Simply playing the, "well you don't HAVE to pay for it" card is silly because obviously that doesn't necessary justify it. Would be nice if the entire pack of camo were $7 dollars or something but oh well. Sucks though because I have $1.75 in my PSN account but refuse to add an entire $5 just to purchase one lol.

who cares.

Rip off isn't the right term, but rather, the camos are overpriced. However, it does not mean that Treyarch is committing a crime in adding additional content to THEIR product.

Some of us have lives you know.... and dont want to spend that much time in getting Gold/Diamond Camos

If there is a camo I like, I am willing to pay for it. If the camo sucks, then I have the OPTION to buy or not. It's not like we are forced to buy them.

Yes the price is a bit too much, but Activision/Treyarch needs to make money.

It's funny to see camo whores complain about paying for things lol