(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Hello , recently Ive seen the trailers and i think this new game will be a poor attempt at a "modern" spin-off of Call of duty World at War from trey arch. personally i think infinity ward has hands down made the best installments in the call of duty series only to be dragged down by the poor designing, and even worse idea staff of trey arch . Now that the majority, if not the whole infinity ward team is leaving the call of duty series, i think that trey arch is simply going to pound the historic games into the ground with stupid side games and more low budget "Call of Duty: (some random conflict in history)" games. Good news is that infinity ward is starting their own series of games, which with some luck (this is going to happen), is going to explode and will probably (definately) become more popular then the Call of Duty series. Tell me what you think? p.s. please don't through a bitch fit... thanks!



i am replying to the messages below as of 5-21. i thought W@W was terrible as the game looked horrible. the only thing semi enjoyable in that game was zombies....... ZOMBIES. this was a SIDE GAME and people found it to be the highlight of play... that says plenty enough by itself. also, please, please do not tell me that Mw2 is cheap, as i know it is, and imply W@W was SO much better. flame throwers..... really. not to mention you could disappear under the map by jumping into the corner of a house, Jesus. wait whats this, a big ass tank to roam the map, with a cannon attached, seems fair, and loads of fun.... wait...... NO. how about the tank whores whom focused the game into wizzing around in an impenetrable box. ohh haha, and "flak jacket"........ ya

treyarch makes games that has historic backgrounds. which is kool and you learn from it and enjoy it.
infinity wards makes it just for fun. and puts some random modern story to fit their pocket.
if you dont like history its understandable

It might be like mw2

The trailers look totally awsome

But the game is totally SHIT!

Is no one f*ckin happy with any game these days?

I dont care what anyone say, if a leg flys of with a spray of blood when I shoot them with a high caliber gun then it beats mw2 straight away.

ppl complain that WaW was crap cos the guns were old... well duh its ww2 for christ sake, plus they know and we know that if it was older guns not many ppl would buy Black Ops.

Not to forget this is one of Trayarch's last game apparently so they want to make a game to match if not better than IW's mw2 before Sledgehammer Games make there cod game set for 2011 and that game is set to be an action-adventure genre game.:scared:

who knows maybe Sledgehammer Games will make the worsed CoD game.

This guys name should be Stanley..

You're obviously a pissed off stan of IW who's gonna be pissed when the majority of people stop playing MW2, including myself.

i agree the trailers look horrible compared to infinity ward's version of the modern era of the series. The guns look like plastic and in the trailer they didn't even bother to show a variety of guns all they did was show a bunch of m4's and a AUG. MW2 > Black Ops

Treyarch has something that most developers don't these days, THEY CARE ABOUT THEIR GAME AND COMMUNITY. IW doesn't care about their community, or their game, they just want to make their game with the mindset of what can make a best seller. Perfect example is MW2. The only time that you will see IW care about their community is when enough people bitch, Remember the Model's?


The only good Call of Dutys were Cod, Cod2 and Cod4.

Call of Duty 3 was decent at best.

WaW was only good for Zombies.

MW2 is shit, to many reasons to list.

haha throw is spelt throw lol sorry. also you can have your own opiniun about the game. im glad you expressed your feelings for it. if people say your stupid then there stupid for calling your opiniun DUMB lol just saying. nice post.

A common misconception:

Modern Warfare > World at War < Modern Warfare 2

Or Modern Warfare < World at War > Modern Warfare 2

In all actuality, though, this is how it goes:

Modern Warfare ≅ World at War ≅ Modern Warfare 2

None of these games are better than each other, and it is as simple as that. We all have our own preferences, as all human beings do, but there are no facts that make any one of these games better than the other. Each have their pros, and each have their cons. To say World at War sucks is to say Modern Warfare sucked, due to the similarity between the two games. Perhaps Treyarch should have gotten more creative, but all the same, it is very similar to its predecessor, and therefore should not be looked down upon.

Modern Warfare 2 took a chance, and implemented many new things into the Call of Duty franchise. Titles and emblems, and customizable kill streaks, Modern Warfare 2 gave us creative freedom like never before. Was the system flawless? Certainly not, it had, and still has many issues to this day.

My point in this is that to say any one of these games are better than the other is mere opinion, no facts. Trashing Infinity Ward or Treyarch is simply a waste of time, as neither of the two are better than the others indefinitely. I think we all should give Treyarch a chance to shine with this title, instead of dismissing it based on some early trailers of the game. The game still has a long way to go, and despite the developer, it could be a great game.

w@w can suk my nuts, so can this game, fuccck treyarch they suck nuts all day