Originally posted by CA5U4LTY
Do you even play GB? Do you even have headphones? From what I can tell, no, so that automatically makes your opinion void and meaningless.
Not when I have about 100 friends who use headsets; they all agree it gives you a big advantage.
Originally posted by CA5U4LTY
The only other reason for a headphone is the volume control that it makes more convenient and a mic attachment. Depth perception, loudness, and (with proper speaker placement) surround sound can be achieved with normal speakers. Ive met plenty of players at the LAN war room who use speaker connected sound systems as preferred to a headphone. So once again, you are wrong.
How many people do you know with the luxury of making the amount of noise a setup like that would amass? Can't be too many.
And even if they could, that setup has exactly the same problem as the headset; expense. Meaning somebody with more money yet again has an unfair advantage.
Originally posted by CA5U4LTY
And, no, they are still imbalanced. EX: The M16 in BO has a minimal amount of recoil and a strong damage counter; many other AR's do not. That itself makes the weapon imbalanced according to your tool of measure with the rest right there.
For 2 reasons the M16 is balanced:
a) It's burst fire.
b) It's considerably weaker than a lot of the other ARs.
You're talking to a 2nd prestiger here, I know all the guns inside-out now.
Originally posted by CA5U4LTY
And yes, thats exactly what I think. How dumb of you to indirectly compare them. Can you not appreciate the differences?
I never compared the two you moron /facepalm
The guy I quoted did :bye: