Post: Activision still wants people to pay for BO!
08-11-2010, 12:31 PM #1
zXx-Psycho-xXz
You talkin to me?
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Josh Olin has let us know that we didnt have to pay for the multiplayer of black ops, But bobby kottick has still not agreed with it ( from activision ) according to the website MCV UK. the payment can be introduced for black ops. they will introduce it with the rest of the multiplayer teasers.

Its still a rumor! :evil: :black:
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
08-11-2010, 02:13 PM #11
Ultimate-Playa
[s][move]NGU ELITE Dancing[/move][/s]
I don't think that that will become true. But that is in my opinion.
08-11-2010, 03:40 PM #12
I think Treyarch is going to run into the same problem Infinity Ward did. (With Activision.)
08-11-2010, 03:46 PM #13
TheMagicN
Vault dweller
Originally posted by xXz View Post
source callofduty.nl dutch site of official news

**DUTCH**
aangezien je dus nl bent:
You must login or register to view this content.
08-11-2010, 04:00 PM #14
Ameht!
Dark Knight
its not a rumor and please post link to source
08-11-2010, 04:44 PM #15
B u X
BITCHES LOVE CAKE
Originally posted by SUPERIMIAINI View Post
I disagree entirely with that statement, You think they would introduce such a BAD IDEA OR HATED IDEA as having to pay for MP with one of the biggest title's of the year NOOO WAYY! they would be setting themselves up for chaos in the gaming community. This is not happening, Michael Pachter should have never opened his big mouth in the first place to fuel this rumor.Cool Man (aka Tustin)


Agreed, this wouldn't be the first time Patcher has spreaded unreliable bullshit!
08-11-2010, 04:52 PM #16
SUPERIMIAINI
Machete Don't Text!
Originally posted by b View Post
Agreed, this wouldn't be the first time Patcher has spreaded unreliable bullshit!


He's an analyst I guess he stands to profit from someone doing this?? Don't know who or how but he stands to gain something. 2nd of all shouldn't SONY have a say in this??? I mean it could and would affect them in the long run. Example XBOX users have to pay for XBOX Live why would they double Pay just to play MP for a certain game. The entire idea is asinine, as far as Sony users such as myself I payed for PSN Plus you know what's to shell out more money just to play the MP to a game you already paid money for..shhh EPIC FAIL IN THE MAKING! this is when we all go back to PC Gaming and a certain Bit Torrent Community and don't pay for $hitttttt...lol
08-11-2010, 05:21 PM #17
B u X
BITCHES LOVE CAKE
Originally posted by SUPERIMIAINI View Post
He's an analyst I guess he stands to profit from someone doing this?? Don't know who or how but he stands to gain something. 2nd of all shouldn't SONY have a say in this??? I mean it could and would affect them in the long run. Example XBOX users have to pay for XBOX Live why would they double Pay just to play MP for a certain game. The entire idea is asinine, as far as Sony users such as myself I payed for PSN Plus you know what's to shell out more money just to play the MP to a game you already paid money for..shhh EPIC FAIL IN THE MAKING! this is when we all go back to PC Gaming and a certain Bit Torrent Community and don't pay for $hitttttt...lol


Maybe, but i think id probably pay the extra for MP than going out and spending £300+ upgrading my pc to run at the same quality as my ps3 lol. But i see your point, i think its rediculus you should have to pay £45 for a game then have to pay an extra £10-£20 extra to play online, especially if your already paying a premium. I can sort of reason charging non-premium customers, but still the idea is a little ahead of its self.
08-11-2010, 05:34 PM #18
SUPERIMIAINI
Machete Don't Text!
Originally posted by b View Post
Maybe, but i think id probably pay the extra for MP than going out and spending £300+ upgrading my pc to run at the same quality as my ps3 lol. But i see your point, i think its rediculus you should have to pay £45 for a game then have to pay an extra £10-£20 extra to play online, especially if your already paying a premium. I can sort of reason charging non-premium customers, but still the idea is a little ahead of its self.


I agree the Idea is ahead of itself and ahead of it's time, Maybe I could see this down the rode 5-6 years from now with a new system out. But not now specially how the economy is, just wouldn't work I don't see mom's and dad's not paying a cell phone bill to pay for little Timmy's Black Ops MP TIME...LOL on the other hand I understand it's a business and there in business to make money so if were talking about $15 or $20 bucks for a year then fine I think people could live with that but to pay $20 bucks a month or something like that is just ridiculous. Eek
08-11-2010, 06:29 PM #19
boss10000
Like A.....
the video games market is a ripe off look at DVD/ movies you dont pay £30 to get the dvd to then only watch 1 hour and be told you need to pay a fee to watch the rest of it.

this wont happen if no one buys a game which does this, if they want more money do what LBP did release loads of mini content for people that want it e.g gun camos, items for your guy ect (no new guns or new maps) this isnt game changing and supplys loads of content that will get content

ps EA FTW

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo