Post: The truth about why the game is worse on ps3
Options
12-15-2010, 11:43 PM
#1
boss10000
Like A.....
12-16-2010, 02:33 PM
#11
gola
OVER 9000!
Originally posted by Green
Very True , and just because they've use 90% of the PS3's potential doesn't mean it will only get 10% better, The engines that are used to create the games can improve i.e better texture streaming. So soon they may be able to achieve the same results a uncharted 2 whilst using less of the PS3's potential. It does come down to lazyness most other developers ain't like this its just because Treyarch know no matter what they did with BO they would sell millions of copies , any other developer has to try and create the best game possible because they don't have as many people buying the game just for the brand (call of duty).
Alot of you don't realise that the PS3 only has twice the hardware power because of it being un-able to handle it if it only had the hardware power, just as an example as that of an xbox 360, as the playstation is coded differently, and in a harder way for developers.
12-16-2010, 02:37 PM
#12
SUPERIMIAINI
Machete Don't Text!
Originally posted by Green
Very True , and just because they've use 90% of the PS3's potential doesn't mean it will only get 10% better, The engines that are used to create the games can improve i.e better texture streaming. So soon they may be able to achieve the same results a uncharted 2 whilst using less of the PS3's potential. It does come down to lazyness most other developers ain't like this its just because Treyarch know no matter what they did with BO they would sell millions of copies , any other developer has to try and create the best game possible because they don't have as many people buying the game just for the brand (call of duty).
You have a point I mean COD is like NIKE people buy it because EVERYONE DOES! I mean look what CRYTEK is doing with there CRYTEK ENGINE 3 it's probably the best out there look what they did with FAR CRY #1 and CRYSIS for PC it's to bad they never got the chance to make FAR CRY 2 but with CRYSIS 2 coming out for PS3 you will really get to see a good engine at work and what a game with no shortcuts can be.
12-16-2010, 02:38 PM
#13
cody97124241
Splicer
12-16-2010, 02:44 PM
#14
kleszyk
Big Daddy
Originally posted by Green
Very True , and just because they've use 90% of the PS3's potential doesn't mean it will only get 10% better, The engines that are used to create the games can improve i.e better texture streaming. So soon they may be able to achieve the same results a uncharted 2 whilst using less of the PS3's potential. It does come down to lazyness most other developers ain't like this its just because Treyarch know no matter what they did with BO they would sell millions of copies , any other developer has to try and create the best game possible because they don't have as many people buying the game just for the brand (call of duty).
good thery mate.
When you think of it they don't Need perfect graphics as they wont be able to improve on it much, so with slightly worse graphs they can release a slightly improved COD game every year, money rolls in.
As for companys like Naughty Dog, the last game I remember by them was Crash lol (never played Drakes uncharted).
Not extremly well known meaning they Needed to make a game that will make an impact.
12-16-2010, 09:10 PM
#15
Cyber Altair
League Champion
Originally posted by kleszyk
good thery mate.
When you think of it they don't Need perfect graphics as they wont be able to improve on it much, so with slightly worse graphs they can release a slightly improved COD game every year, money rolls in.
As for companys like Naughty Dog, the last game I remember by them was Crash lol (never played Drakes uncharted).
Not extremly well known meaning they Needed to make a game that will make an impact.
When you think of it they don't Need perfect graphics as they wont be able to improve on it much, so with slightly worse graphs they can release a slightly improved COD game every year, money rolls in.
As for companys like Naughty Dog, the last game I remember by them was Crash lol (never played Drakes uncharted).
Not extremly well known meaning they Needed to make a game that will make an impact.
Not extremely well known? They are and were one of the biggest Playstation developers be it with Crash on the PS1, Jak on the PS2 and Uncharted on the PS3. They didn't need to make a game for the sake of getting their name out there but they did gain a lot of fame outside of the playstation community after Sony hyped Uncharted 2.
12-16-2010, 09:32 PM
#16
boss10000
Like A.....
Originally posted by kleszyk
As for companys like Naughty Dog, the last game I remember by them was Crash lol (never played Drakes uncharted).
Not extremly well known meaning they Needed to make a game that will make an impact.
Dude what the hell are you on about naughty dog are the most famous game design company in the world the made crash bandicoot they made uncharted, look at gametrailers they voted naughty dog game designer of the year, last year, if you do not know about naughty dog then you are not be a true gamer. Naughty dog are legends and are 100X better than treyarch or infinity ward, high sales does not mean better, cigerates sale millions does not mean there good, does it?
The following user thanked boss10000 for this useful post:
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
