Post: The truth about why the game is worse on ps3
12-15-2010, 11:43 PM #1
boss10000
Like A.....
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Anyone that watches Pacheco attack ( carnt get link cause on phone) will rember the episode where he says the reason that most companies go from xbox to ps3 is cause xbox is a worse console its to do with there being 3 graphic cores in xbox and 7 on ps3 so which is easier 7 to 3. Or 3 to 7 that's why the ports are better on xbox
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
12-15-2010, 11:48 PM #2
i dont get what your trying to say
12-15-2010, 11:50 PM #3
Solo
Rookie
Yeah bro that's definately it. Explain how 7 "graphic cores" would make a worse game.

The following user thanked Solo for this useful post:

Pro-Green
12-15-2010, 11:59 PM #4
SUPERIMIAINI
Machete Don't Text!
Originally posted by Shooter View Post
Yeah bro that's definately it. Explain how 7 "graphic cores" would make a worse game.


IT DOESN'T, what these DEVS are doing is UN-LOGICAL and just being LAZY. This just PROVES how the PS3 design and technology is ahead of it's time that the only game too date to use almost the full potential of the PS3 is Drakes Uncharted 2 where Naughty Dog said they were able to use %90 of the PS3's potential NOW THAT'S HOW YOU MAKE A GAME!Dancing

The following 3 users say thank you to SUPERIMIAINI for this useful post:

Car Lover, LordxReaper, Unonymous
12-16-2010, 10:55 AM #5
boss10000
Like A.....
Ok here's the simple version. With a game like uncharted they split the graphic cores properly so 1 for this level, or 1 for this colour but when you try to go from 3 to 7 it gets split wrongly and that makes the game worse Example you have 3 pieces of chocolate and you split it 7 ways you would not get it perfectly 7 ways this is how it works with videogame consoles they will never get it 100% right, so unless you work to use 7 graphic cores you will never get it 100% right.
12-16-2010, 11:13 AM #6
Cyber Altair
League Champion
It's because coding for the xbox is easier. Not only that but porting it over to the PC is easy. If the use the PS3 as the lead platform it's gonna be more expensive not to mention it'll be harder to port it over.
12-16-2010, 02:04 PM #7
GUESS_HU
< ^ > < ^ >
they just use 3 graphic cores because xbox has 3 not 7 so if they used 7 it would totally not work on xbox. but the thing i dont understand is that if they coded it on ps3 separately then y didnt they use the 7 graphic cores?
12-16-2010, 02:23 PM #8
SUPERIMIAINI
Machete Don't Text!
Originally posted by boss10000 View Post
Ok here's the simple version. With a game like uncharted they split the graphic cores properly so 1 for this level, or 1 for this colour but when you try to go from 3 to 7 it gets split wrongly and that makes the game worse Example you have 3 pieces of chocolate and you split it 7 ways you would not get it perfectly 7 ways this is how it works with videogame consoles they will never get it 100% right, so unless you work to use 7 graphic cores you will never get it 100% right.



You have a very good point :y: but why wouldn't they design the game for PC then which is closer along the lines of technology well PC is actually stronger but you know what I mean "IT'S NOT INFERIOR" design it for PC then port it over to PS3 AND XBOX ???? this would make much more sense. :hitman:
12-16-2010, 02:30 PM #9
gola
OVER 9000!
Originally posted by Cyber
It's because coding for the xbox is easier. Not only that but porting it over to the PC is easy. If the use the PS3 as the lead platform it's gonna be more expensive not to mention it'll be harder to port it over.


This guy is right, simple as that, all mainstream games on all 3 consoles always seem to be made for PC or xbox, then just ported to PS3 as its harder to code on playstation to start off with.
12-16-2010, 02:31 PM #10
Originally posted by SUPERIMIAINI View Post

IT DOESN'T, what these DEVS are doing is UN-LOGICAL and just being LAZY. This just PROVES how the PS3 design and technology is ahead of it's time that the only game too date to use almost the full potential of the PS3 is Drakes Uncharted 2 where Naughty Dog said they were able to use %90 of the PS3's potential NOT THAT'S HOW YOU MAKE A GAME!Dancing


Very True , and just because they've use 90% of the PS3's potential doesn't mean it will only get 10% better, The engines that are used to create the games can improve i.e better texture streaming. So soon they may be able to achieve the same results a uncharted 2 whilst using less of the PS3's potential. It does come down to lazyness most other developers ain't like this its just because Treyarch know no matter what they did with BO they would sell millions of copies , any other developer has to try and create the best game possible because they don't have as many people buying the game just for the brand (call of duty).

The following user thanked Pro-Green for this useful post:

SUPERIMIAINI

Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.

Gray NextGenUpdate Logo