Post: MW3 Vehicles and No Killstreaking In Some Gametypes?!?!
Options
03-12-2011, 01:01 AM
#1
J-J
Skyrim Makes Me Hard
If all of this is true, in my opinion, SledgeHammer is doing a great job so far. As far as map development, I hope to see some small map,s but mostly larger maps like BFBC:2. Those small maps just get annoying and boring.
Don't spam me saying, "Oh this isn't true, there's no way!" or, "Proof or GTFO." This is just a rumor I heard about. IF this is true, when you get Mw3 and you see vehicles you will think, NGU is useful sometimes.
What do you guys think? :hitman:
I think Sledgehammer is going to make it like BFBC:2.
The following user thanked J-J for this useful post:
03-12-2011, 01:04 AM
#2
Mugen904
-Bosna u Srcu-
Originally posted by LilWheezie69x
Ok, so my buddy just told me that he was following somebody on twitter, (he hasn't told me who it was) but they said that there are going to be vehicles, and no killstreaking in objective-based gametypes. If this is try, Sledgehammer is obviously going to have to make bigger maps, which might not go well with some people's play style. If there are a lot of trucks, buggies, etc just to get around the map faster, that would be nice, but I hope if this is true they don't overload maps with tanks if they even have them. Also, no killstreaking in Objective-Based gametypes is what i've been waiting for for a LONG time. All the nooby campers now move to TDM, which is harder as you can't spawn trap.
If all of this is true, in my opinion, SledgeHammer is doing a great job so far. As far as map development, I hope to see some small map,s but mostly larger maps like BFBC:2. Those small maps just get annoying and boring.
Don't spam me saying, "Oh this isn't true, there's no way!" or, "Proof or GTFO." This is just a rumor I heard about. IF this is true, when you get Mw3 and you see vehicles you will think, NGU is useful sometimes.
What do you guys think? :hitman:
If all of this is true, in my opinion, SledgeHammer is doing a great job so far. As far as map development, I hope to see some small map,s but mostly larger maps like BFBC:2. Those small maps just get annoying and boring.
Don't spam me saying, "Oh this isn't true, there's no way!" or, "Proof or GTFO." This is just a rumor I heard about. IF this is true, when you get Mw3 and you see vehicles you will think, NGU is useful sometimes.
What do you guys think? :hitman:
Why would you post this in Black Ops Discussion
The following 2 users say thank you to Mugen904 for this useful post:
The following user thanked Mugen904 for this useful post:
03-12-2011, 01:25 AM
#6
Epic?
Awe-Inspiring
This actually makes me sad.
Play driven vehicles are unfair, any random noob can just jump in them and whore out. Ever played halo? It also causes a mad rush for the vehicles.
If you're going to get into a vehicle you shouldn't have complete control over it, not should you just get it for free, you should have to earn it up through a killstreak.
Removing killstreaks from objective based games is freaking retarded. Reason its retarded: When we do good, we like it, and it feels good to know you're getting something for doing well. I could see creating a play list called "no-killstreaks" wherein they don't use killstreaks, but please, just let us play the game we want to, the non-homo way. Not everyone spawn traps, and even if they do, killstreaks on/off won't make a difference.
All I hope:
No vehicle nubs
Killstreaks are available (maybe slightly less powerful, but we should be able to get UAV/Spy Plane and things like that)
Spawns aren't retardly everywhere, people spawn where they should be, it should be set in some sort of base
The matchmaking system doesn't fail. Is 6 level 50, 10th prestige people on one team and 3 level 1, 1st prestige people really fair?
Play driven vehicles are unfair, any random noob can just jump in them and whore out. Ever played halo? It also causes a mad rush for the vehicles.
If you're going to get into a vehicle you shouldn't have complete control over it, not should you just get it for free, you should have to earn it up through a killstreak.
Removing killstreaks from objective based games is freaking retarded. Reason its retarded: When we do good, we like it, and it feels good to know you're getting something for doing well. I could see creating a play list called "no-killstreaks" wherein they don't use killstreaks, but please, just let us play the game we want to, the non-homo way. Not everyone spawn traps, and even if they do, killstreaks on/off won't make a difference.
All I hope:
No vehicle nubs
Killstreaks are available (maybe slightly less powerful, but we should be able to get UAV/Spy Plane and things like that)
Spawns aren't retardly everywhere, people spawn where they should be, it should be set in some sort of base
The matchmaking system doesn't fail. Is 6 level 50, 10th prestige people on one team and 3 level 1, 1st prestige people really fair?
The following 2 users say thank you to Epic? for this useful post:
03-12-2011, 01:39 AM
#8
ZoneHD
Shiver do you lift?
Originally posted by LilWheezie69x
Ok, so my buddy just told me that he was following somebody on twitter, (he hasn't told me who it was) but they said that there are going to be vehicles, and no killstreaking in objective-based gametypes. If this is try, Sledgehammer is obviously going to have to make bigger maps, which might not go well with some people's play style. If there are a lot of trucks, buggies, etc just to get around the map faster, that would be nice, but I hope if this is true they don't overload maps with tanks if they even have them. Also, no killstreaking in Objective-Based gametypes is what i've been waiting for for a LONG time. All the nooby campers now move to TDM, which is harder as you can't spawn trap.
If all of this is true, in my opinion, SledgeHammer is doing a great job so far. As far as map development, I hope to see some small map,s but mostly larger maps like BFBC:2. Those small maps just get annoying and boring.
Don't spam me saying, "Oh this isn't true, there's no way!" or, "Proof or GTFO." This is just a rumor I heard about. IF this is true, when you get Mw3 and you see vehicles you will think, NGU is useful sometimes.
What do you guys think? :hitman:
If all of this is true, in my opinion, SledgeHammer is doing a great job so far. As far as map development, I hope to see some small map,s but mostly larger maps like BFBC:2. Those small maps just get annoying and boring.
Don't spam me saying, "Oh this isn't true, there's no way!" or, "Proof or GTFO." This is just a rumor I heard about. IF this is true, when you get Mw3 and you see vehicles you will think, NGU is useful sometimes.
What do you guys think? :hitman:
You must login or register to view this content.
The following user thanked ZoneHD for this useful post:
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
