(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Hello NGU users!
I am going to share my thoughts on the game (Call Of Duty: Black Ops)

Campaign:
The Campaign in Call Of Duty: Black Ops is I think a very well story lined action packed gameplay. I believe the effort put into this was all worth it, as it is my favourite campaign in the Call Of Duty series.

Zombies:
I believe most people will agree with me the zombie missions are one of the best things Call Of Duty has encountered. I do play zombies the most out of all 3 types of gameplay.

Multiplayer:
The multiplayer experience was a let-down for most old Call Of Duty fans. I believe this is because of the hit marker system they had used for the game. Now i don’t know if this is correct but, i think the reason why it is so bad is because of the amount of graphics used in the Maps or the Guns. This is where Infinity Ward up there game, as they have a graphic system source code that allows graphics to have no effect on their hit marker system, as we have seen with their previous tittles.

I would like to hear your feedback on what you think as well!

i was just wondering late this is lol

Nice review at the end of the day though it comes down to this:

Campaign = Good

Zombies = Same old, formula getting repetitive now

Multiplayer = Awful

The campaign was not good. I beat it so fast, I was pissed when I beat it. Reznov dies twice and then the game is over.

I do not even bother playing campaign unless I do not have online atm... Zombies I play when Im not doing well in multiplayer... :love:

zombies=awesome
campaign=ok
multiplayer crap yet addictive

Campaign is whatever. Zombies is fun to play with friends. Multilayer I sometimes enjoy playing.

Campaign is good (if you do it on veteran first time and not be a pussy on regular)
Online is fun and addictive
Zombies is kick ass :fyea:

Campaign wise bops shows up all the flaws of modern shooters and why shooters Campaigns have all but died. Due to them being linear gentric with bad stories.
It a shame but am disappointed trey could have broken the mold and did something special.

Zombies is zombies
Fun mini game designed to make you fail before the higher rounds. Do find it odd that trey has changed how the zombies react so you can abuse it more then WAW.
Then they try and counter players from grouping zombies together in the DLC odd that.

Multiplayer :
Black ops Multiplayer is fun however is flawed at the core of the game. It flaws are spawns and map design along with certain mechanics to be abused to do good.
Same business as past games however killstreaks play less of a part if you can't pull them together constant.

Overall it fun but the flaws can be annoying if used against you. Sadly due to the map design along with new killstreak system camping works still. Only way to fix camping problem and speed up COD so it suits it fast gameplay mechanics is a complete redesign of maps.

So far it appears the devs can't see how map design slows down the game.
COD map design has always been basic to keep fast gameplay however with it pretty easy to camp high traffic areas this slows the game down.

Sooo bops is a COD game flawed but fun. Nothing much game changing with it apart from the level of support given to this title so far. Trey do show promise with nerfing and changing elements of the game after release.
Black ops does do something MW2 failed to do which is keep the action gun and gun with less non gun things killing you. This makes the game less annoying overall as you can counter a gun over say a noobtube across the map.

It is COD4 without it being a game changer.


That being rude but your review is pretty basic and stats some facts. It fails to explain what wrong and how it goes wrong. Just tells me something is wrong. It almost like modern reviews these days.

Above is a better example

whats so bad with the hit marker?