(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Okay so recently I have been play quite a bit of cod4 and well I started to use the Acog on the M40A3 and been doing quite well with it. Then I noticed that from when I had to do the Acog challenges on the Intervention and the Barrett that it was MUCH harder to get kills with, using SOH pro, it was still much tougher to do than with cod4.. where you were able to run around quickscoping and getting beastly kills with the acog. What happened? I do recall hearing that there were no differences between the cod4 and mw2 acog, except the apparent visual ones.

Any ideas if there is infact differences between the two games ACOG scope and it being used on snipers, or is the thermal really the new acog?

Well go ahead and discuss your opinions.

cod4 acog better on snipers
mw2 acog better 4 rifles

This is what I found to be true, I never really used ACOGs on anything but snipers on CoD4. I still use an ACOG sometimes on the Intervention but I've been using the TAR for a while.

Everything's better on Cod4, but you guys should try mastering the Intervention acog because it's nasty.

Ive tried using it and I prefer the thermal as its pretty fast and seems more accurate. But yeah cod4 is better in some ways, but MW2 has all that nice new stuff, really IW just needs to add a playlist where there are only 3-5-7 KS/s because that will make me stop going back to cod4.