3 things,
1. the mw2 single player is 10x better than bfbc2. It has more of a storyline that keeps you wanting to play more. Ive never had so much fun playing campaign as in mw2.
2. Multiplayer, in my opinion, mw2 is wayyy better. The clip he showed of course was a search and destroy game where you are supposed to move slowly! He expects you to just run out there and if you die you don't respawn... As for bfbc2, i found that it takes you about a minute of running just to get to the enemy, and then they are camping two. The clips he showed were the most action you will get in bfbc2.
3. VEICHLES! honestly, he put this as a category. If he says, well in life you need veichles, well then it should be under the realism category idiot. Thats like saying you could make your own section for killstreaks.

Overall, this guy is a complete idiot and is extremely biased.

This is bs. The person who made this video is most probably some 11 year old who fails at playing a good fps. He should keep it to himself.

I kinda prefer bc for its teamwork

BC is much better for the destruction engine. I also like the fact that you don't have to listen to winers in the pregame lobby.

Bad Company 2 is the best FPS I've played other than COD4 and BF2, people who say it sucks is because they quit easily and suck at real games that take skill. At first Bad Company 2 pissed me off because I was a noob with no guns, but I progressed and played smart, now I'm owning noobs.

this vid is Bias.. i like how he picks Search N Destroy for MW2 multiplayer.. also when i played BC2 there was just as much camping on that game.. every time i got killed was from some guy hiding in a building or in the bush somewhere waiting for someone to come around..

the only thing i can say that is different is that BC2 is just a bigger game.. both need teamwork to win.. MW2 mainly because the maps are small..

also these are 2 games really can't compared.. the only vehicles in MW2 are the killstreaks.. it's not like you can just jump into a vehicle and drive it around and kill everything..

mw2 and socom are the only ones you can really compare them against each other.. it it wasnt the fact that socom was 3rd person.. i would play it more often.. also i have no clue how to get better guns in Socom.. lol.. but it is an awesome game..

so your saying that warfare is about running around the map killing each other, look at any war documentary/movie wars are fought from each side like battlefield.
anyway i love battlefield and its a game that youve to stick at to really appreciate it. i saw alot of people comment on this that they tried it once and never went back. theres too many people on this forum that will never get their heads out of mw2 and try different games. you miss out on so much

the vid maker made it look like there wasn't much camping in BC2 but alot more in MW2.. which is not true.. both have the same amount of campers in it.. please read before posting thanks

i have never said i hated the game.. but you can't compare the two games.. BC2 if just way to big(map and vehicles) compared to MW2..

so basically if both teams just stayed back in their side of the maps then where would the fight be?.. i was stating the fact that the person that made this vid made it look like there was so much running around in BC2 and alot of Camping is MW2.. he's making it look like it takes no teamwork in MW2.. which in fact they both have the same amount..

also if i was to look at documentaries then i would be shooting rockets 2000+ miles away from the comfort of my bunker.. so please don't bring movies and Doc's into this.. cause it's a game not real life.. if real life was like this then im sure everyone would be in the army(since they get to respawn everytime they die)

I have and do play other games.. I just prefer playing COD games more cause the action is non stop.. everytime i play other games it takes more time to get things done.. most the time you're running around looking for a good place to get to because you spawn on the other side of the map..