(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Which do you prefer ?

either.

stun = faster
flash = more efficient

smoke cause they can't see me coming and I have no problem getting kills with it

Stun.

'Nuff said.

I'm not really sure about it but don't stuns give hitmarkers and flashes don't? I have never really used flashes or whatever but thats what i've always thought. Anyway I always use stuns as an indicator of whether someone is there rather than to rush in and kill someone. I just use the hitmarker to know if they are there and then base my next move on that.

Stuns, because the animation is quick, and they don't explode until they hit the ground, unlike the flash which has a timed explosion.

flashes show hitmarkers and if someone is in a place where there is less ground up high, using a flash is best to run up and shoot them instead of missing with a stun. besides, using the flash is better for campers. stun does nothing. the quicker animation is pointless and only good if youre rushing and used to quickness.

Its gotta be stuns. One reason if you accidently stun yourself you can recover easy but flashing is bad. C'mon we've all done it

He throws these overhand, I don't like the way he throws the other one...