(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Okay, so yesterday I was playing S&, the round started and I spawn-toob (or as I like to say, Quicktoob) and kill this one guy. I guess he got pretty mad so he sent me a message saying that I should use the Intervention, so I own him with it the next round, then he blames my Steady Aim perk and then calls me garbage, and ragequits.

Honestly I use Steady Aim because I find it more accurate when I quickscope, but other people hate it as if only noobs use it, and I am most certainly no noob. I guess they need some excuse to make my skill look like crap is to say I use steady aim. So I post this on NextGenUpdate to see what other people think :mudkip:

I agree, the most important thing is that u feel comfortable with whatever perk u are using

i use steady aim because im a noob
=P

You have mastered a technique and are playing within the game rules. If someone gets mad at your for it, it is their problem.

First off all, in many clangames SA isn't allowed. That's why i play without SA. Anyway SA is for noobs i think. Nothing makes me angrier than a noob, who can't quicksope, but hit me with random noscope just because of SA.

Someone who plays without SA is MUCH more skilled, then someone with. And nobody can say, youre just because of SA so good, after you rape him 20-5 in 1v1

Other wise I'd use SA if I record my gameplay, so i could do epic Gamewinning No-Scopes :mudkip:

I like steady aim for my sniper, cuz I'm not that good at quickscoping, and huge crosshairs just mean I'll miss alot of quickscopes

I Usually use sit rep pro , but use steady aim when i feel like it

steady aims mainly made for sniping...its just people like optic who dont use steady aim put this in peoples heads, their optic fanboys, thinking steady aims for noobs...its there for sniping