(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); This isn't too much about mw2 but it still is and to be honest i dunno where else i could post it so here it goes.

People are now saying that treyarch owns and they care about their players bla bla bla.. Why? because mw2 blew massive whale

Most of these people are people who hated W@W and mocked it to a point where they made it less appealing to people who liked the game such as myself. I always liked treyarch and i always will like them but other people are liking them for the wrong reasons. Just because mw2 is bad dosn't mean bo will be great.

If you didn't enjoy W@W then what makes you think you'll like black ops and if mw2 was bad and cod4 is to old now you shouldn't like treyarch just because they're releasing the new game.

And honestly company wars aside because were not making any profit, you shouldn't judge a game in the first place just because a certain company is making it before even seeing much of it being played.

Kk im sorry this is just my little pet peve and im defensive over cod5.

Now you didn't say cod5 is shit so ill be nice but think about it logically.. if they really are clones and one was developed more than the other... the more developed one is better logically..

As for the fact that you say they're clones.. what do you expect.. if they changed it completely people would complain and now that they made a good game and yes of course followed the previous guidelines for success how could you say that its bad.. And treyarch already confirmed many game breaking points of MW2 to not be included in Blackops so your entire theory is unjustified..

Ps - if your wondering what points there are off the top of my head no commando, claymore spam as you get one per life no noob tubes spam and some more that im forgetting at the momment

---------- Post added at 10:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:32 PM ----------



Yeah they're the best games out there, im just talking relative to one another.

Everyone seems to forget that activision makes the final calls. If something needs patched, than they have to approve it. So lets hope treyarch makes a less broken game, so one or 2 patches will fix everything.

In my honest opinion, take your rants elsewhere. Posting stuff like this on NextGen will almost definitely not sway anyone into not buying BO just because you think "oh MW2 sucks thats the only reason anyones buying it, don't!". Truth is, you'll probably buy it as well.

i can do it, should we not be able to do this on mw2?

Again, I'm not saying being a clone is a bad thing, it's just the truth. Everyone is treating BO like some sort of godlike game to the call of duty series, it'll be so much different from MW2 when in reality it won't. It'll be standard multiplayer with standard perks, standard guns, the usual. I'm sure they've taken time to actually balance everything out, which I'm glad they have done. It's still the same core gameplay though, which I'm sure none of you have a problem with anyway so idunno why I'm still going on about nothing.

Well honestly the reason people are treating it differently are because it won't have the game breaking points mw2 had. IMO mw2 isn't a bad game and i have a suspicion that most people agree they just love to complain.