(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); The ACR is really Steady, But it has almost no damage.
The Scar is deadly, But some recoil.

Think about this 1!


(First Post, FTW)

The argument wasn't based on the Red dot. You can't tell me you thought the last gun was better than the m16. BTW I think the ACR is better, its just your way of getting to that answer seemed flawed to me.

thats a good point pricey

(btw wasnt the last gun in cod 4 the stg-44, or something along those lines, the ww2 gun?)

That's the one. It was awful! I remember it from my brief time on WAW. It was shite on there too.

I don't know which game you're playing but it clearly states the ACR causes less damage than the SCAR-H!!

To be honest, i use the ACR, but it pisses me off with how little damage it causes. The SCAR-H is good and accurate in my eyes. I'd have to say the SCAR-H w/ extended mags on this one.

it says it has less damage in the stats yea, but we all know the stats arnt all accurate in the game, just look at the Tar, it is just as accurate as the scar when i use it mate (despite stats being so poor), although the scar has less recoil imo

im starting to wonder if the stats are there for a placebo effect

id say ACR its alot better IMO the acc, recoil is great which makes up for the low damage, so its actually a really powerful gun.

tie but if ur prestigeing a lot scar

I love both weapons but best for me when i play is a scar with extended mags FMJbullets and sometimes i swap extended mags for silencer. its one of the few guns i dont need a red dot or scope for. Acr is still good gun tho

ACR FTW its soo accurate i usually get at least 5 or 6 headshots