Post: Why guns are "overpowered"
Options
01-24-2010, 05:52 PM
#1
Schwalm
Guest
I guess what I'm trying to get at is that guns are overpowered for a reason, and there is no reason to take the damage away because some children cry about them too much. So maybe chill on the threads about reducing the guns range/damage and just deal with it, or else go out into the real war and see how long you last rushing them with your sniper rifle trying to quick scope.
The following 13 users say thank you to Schwalm for this useful post:
01-24-2010, 06:04 PM
#11
Nexxy
Formerly Psycho194
Originally posted by La.
all real guns are 1 shot kills, end of, the game isnt 1 shot kills for a reason, its an arcade shooter, if you want realism go play OP dragon rising. soz but your wrong OP
That's not true at all. If I shoot you in the stomach with a pistol from semi-long range, you wouldn't die if you got medical attention. Or if I shoot you in the foot.
But, A .50 Caliber rifle (Intervention and Barret) will always kill if hit above the waist. Getting hitmarkers when you should kill them is really annoying.
01-24-2010, 06:07 PM
#12
CheateR13
Climbing up the ladder
Originally posted by iSchwalm
If I was in war, I woulnd't be playing any shooting games...
lol than why tell people to go out into the real war? my brother is a marine n he still plays shooting games cuz its a type of game he can relate to. n war is different, you have to follow orders. doubt they would put someone out there who isnt ready.
@Psycho: i agree with you, getting shot below the waist wont kill you
01-24-2010, 06:10 PM
#14
Dub Zee
SE Londons Finest
Originally posted by Psycho194
That's not true at all. If I shoot you in the stomach with a pistol from semi-long range, you wouldn't die if you got medical attention. Or if I shoot you in the foot.
But, A .50 Caliber rifle (Intervention and Barret) will always kill if hit above the waist. Getting hitmarkers when you should kill them is really annoying.
But, A .50 Caliber rifle (Intervention and Barret) will always kill if hit above the waist. Getting hitmarkers when you should kill them is really annoying.
i changed my post cos i knew this would be the response i was going to get, if you get shot in the head 99.9% of the time you die, no ifs or buts, seeing as this is an arcade shooter based on war (terrorist) then you would be going for head shots everytime, hence 1 shot kills, i stand by what i say though, your wrong
p.s a .50 cal barrett Rifle will most likely kill you where ever you are shot in real life, it will blow a chunk of you away, if your hit in the leg your most likely die from shock and if not you will bleed to death
01-24-2010, 06:14 PM
#15
Nexxy
Formerly Psycho194
Originally posted by La.
i changed my post cos i knew this would be the response i was going to get, if you get shot in the head 99.9% of the time you die, no ifs or buts, seeing as this is an arcade shooter based on war (terrorist) then you would be going for head shots everytime, hence 1 shot kills, i stand by what i say though, your wrong
p.s a .50 cal barrett Rifle will most likely kill you where ever you are shot in real life, it will blow a chunk of you away, if your hit in the leg your most likely die from shock and if not you will bleed to death
p.s a .50 cal barrett Rifle will most likely kill you where ever you are shot in real life, it will blow a chunk of you away, if your hit in the leg your most likely die from shock and if not you will bleed to death
Well I meant dieing instantly, bleeding to death would take a few minutes.
And are you saying in real life you would always aim for the head, or in the game? Because IDK about you, but I just try to get the kill. I only actually try to get a headshot when his back is to me.
01-24-2010, 06:20 PM
#16
Dub Zee
SE Londons Finest
Originally posted by Psycho194
Well I meant dieing instantly, bleeding to death would take a few minutes.
And are you saying in real life you would always aim for the head, or in the game? Because IDK about you, but I just try to get the kill. I only actually try to get a headshot when his back is to me.
And are you saying in real life you would always aim for the head, or in the game? Because IDK about you, but I just try to get the kill. I only actually try to get a headshot when his back is to me.
yes bleeding to death would, but while thats happening you wouldnt be in a position to fire back a-la last/final stand
in real life ud go for head shots, cos lets face it, in war, you'd want to kill the enemy before they kill you right? going for headshots is the quickest way and conserves ammo, after all theres no respawn in real life
same can be said for FPS games, even though its an arcade shooter the princible is the same, head shots over body shots always kill quicker and most effective way to play
01-24-2010, 07:26 PM
#17
Schwalm
Guest
Originally posted by La.
yes bleeding to death would, but while thats happening you wouldnt be in a position to fire back a-la last/final stand
in real life ud go for head shots, cos lets face it, in war, you'd want to kill the enemy before they kill you right? going for headshots is the quickest way and conserves ammo, after all theres no respawn in real life same can be said for FPS games, even though its an arcade shooter the princible is the same, head shots over body shots always kill quicker and most effective way to play
in real life ud go for head shots, cos lets face it, in war, you'd want to kill the enemy before they kill you right? going for headshots is the quickest way and conserves ammo, after all theres no respawn in real life
same can be said for FPS games, even though its an arcade shooter the princible is the same, head shots over body shots always kill quicker and most effective way to play
I agree with what you say, I every gun was a 1 shot kill in the head, I would be aiming for the head also.
01-24-2010, 08:15 PM
#18
OUCHH SNiP3DD
Bounty hunter
01-24-2010, 08:26 PM
#19
I_BULLET_I
Fcuk Do I Put Here
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
