Originally posted by Wondoh
Bit of an unfair comparison, one is full of actual gameplay and the other is just shots from a trailer, (i know that the BF was a trailer too) so the Mw3 shots are going to be of a lower quality as they are from a fast paced trailer :y:
actually no, the BF3 is actual gameplay so it is more motion. MW3 is all animation so, sadly, it will probably look worse than that. Also, MW3 is close to its final beta stages, where as BF3 is probably just starting them. MW3 is the closest finished and is just a rehashed engine, so expect a little better than black ops.
OP next time try to get the BF3 pictures with less movement and motion blur, which effs up the comparison.
---------- Post added at 05:30 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:23 PM ----------
the reason most people think the MW3 pictures look good is because of the insane amount of gloss on the models. It makes them shine, which catches the eye, but gloves, helmets and weapons don't shine like that (some weapons do, tho). and the reloading animation is basically all animation that isn't the same as any reloading animation from the game. BTW in the BF3 gameplay the player is holding an M4 with flashlight and a type of ACOG scope, where as in MW3 i BELIEVE it is the AR-15 because the other main character is holding the shitty looking M4 from MW2. Looks like a plastic toy