Originally posted by mitchell865
mw3 looks almost ecxactly like mw2 due to the fact that mw2 was spectacular and was the best selling game of all TIME so y would they want to change
So you think it's value for money buying the (almost) exact same game again? If you answer yes, grow up, learn how money works then come back. If no, then how on earth did you come to the conclusion MW2 was spectacular? It was a mess, noob-tubes, OMA, commando and whatever else everywhere. None of the weapons had any recoil, all the weapons were too easy, QS-ing was too easy and it gave QS-ers a bad name, the maps were way too big for 6v6 games and I could go on and on...
Oh, and it was the best selling game of all time because they advertised it to such an extent that most of the planet knew of it's existence come November, you can't beat mass-advertising.
And if you were to ask every CoD player which CoD was best, at least 75% of them would choose CoD4, and that 75% would be made up mostly by hardcore gamers. Y'know, the ones that see things for how they really are in games.
But really... if you're happy paying £40/$60+ for the same game again... you genuinely have no perspective of value for money, clearly. In-fact your parents probably buy your games I'm guessing, correct?