(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); OK so im seeing people comparing these games constantly. They can not be compared. BF is a trying to be slow paced, realistic shooter for the people who like that and Mw3 is fast paced and more of an arcade shooter. It is like comparing NFS to GT5 or Forza, it just can not be done. Im sorry if this thread is pointless but im tired of seeing people compare the games. They both appeal to different people and depending on what type of game you like depends on which you prefer.
Rant over, Thanks for reading.

Maybe stop making threads of comparing bf3 n mw3 n den we wont have to compare em then!

You cannot compare BF and MW

If you know DICE also created MOH which is imo compareable to MW3 since the small maps, close combat etc.

BF may also been a shooter in the modern days, the multiplayer gameplay is just a huge difference.
E.G.
The map sizes
The Class choices
The gameplay
The ammount of players
etc.

The games haven't got much in common, except that it's a shooter.

The only thing you can compare are the graphics and the singleplayer story etc.
Also Robert noted that bf will be a great game. they aren't even competing since they both know both developers know that the audience likes a game because of the preferences of both, and some will buy both. Saying that game is better is just an opinion, because the gameplay is so different.

i think this is the fifth thred i saw about this

bf3 all the way i used to love cod not anymore