(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

You must login or register to view this content.




Took them like 1 months? crazy lol and they still aren't even as good as black ops patch notes.



"Updates to the Spawn system"
ONLY THING I CARE ABOUT.

I looooove your sig :carling:

Rapid fire and too good of a hip fire spread

Well the hip fire spread is too good with rapid fire.

No news on a M16 buff , shotguns or LMGs buff so they keep the damage at range. Or removing quick ADS from snipers
IF they buff shotguns am happy with snipers being so powerful.
Nice to see they are fixing the Reticle on certain guns. I forget what one is wrong.

CM-901 Attachments is interesting.....does that mean other weapons are going to be fixed which do that or give a gun a boost.
Or if the other guns are meant to be like that.

If you hitmarker a dude with a type-95 (using a sniper obviously), that sniper is screwed

Of course they patch guns that only scrubs cry about. How about patching that scrubby ass Support pkg. Stealth Bomber is the RC Car off this game. Sick of wannabe quik scopers going 10-30 yet earning enough points for a Noob Bomber.

Type 95 is a burst gun, so the more bursts it takes the eaker it is so why patch it? If you make it like the BO M16 it's useless. The time to fire more than 1 burst is negated by EVERY automatic weapon in game.

Same shit 3arc did to the G11. Majority of the people who cry about guns get owned by them and can't do half as good when they use them.

I don't use Akimbo FMGs but doesn't mean they should be patched. Type 95 has disadvantages already but the COD cries regardless...

---------- Post added at 07:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:32 PM ----------



Pop in MW2 and use the M16 or FAMAS WITHOUT SP at close range and you'll change your tune.

Making guns weaker only creates LESS gun diversity. But it says attachments so maybe just balancing of Rapid Fire,Akimbo, etc.

nice sig :carling:

Thanks it's really fun ^.^

Here's the thing, in MW2 the other guns in MW2 were also just as good as the Famas, all the ARs were pretty much all the same. In MW3 it's not like that, that's why the Type95 stands out in MW3 and the Famas didn't.

Famas did not have rapid fire in mw2 (i can't remember) and seeing as it is only 2 out of 3 bullets that need to hit you rapid fire makes that happen as it looks like 1 bullet.

Rapid Fire only makes the bursts shoot faster,it doesn't make the time in between bursts faster so it essentially makes people spray and pray more so removing that attachment wouldn't be a big deal. It's like tose Barrett sprayers vs Bolt Action.

Also ACR/Scar are used more than Type 95. Scar, ACR, PP90M1, CM901, G36, MP7 are just as deadly as Type 95 and all are used pretty equally on the PS3 side at least. Those other guns allow you to spray while the Type 95 rewards accuracy and as shit as connections can be an ACR/Scar or damn near any SMG will out gun an average Type 95 user with the lag in the game.

I've always been against gun nerfs especially burst weapons. People blame connection, "camping" and whatever excuse they use for situations they died and it's terrible. There are always guns and perks that people who are good at a game can make look even more beastly than they are but rarely do people feel they're outplayed,they always wanna find some excuse to justify deaths and the "gun is overpowered" argument is so easy to use. If more people start using MP7 with rapid fire I can guarantee it will be the next OP gun.

COD is full of excuses. There are guys with .60 k/d who will blame campers, OP guns, etc when the numbers show they suck.

And yes MW2 had lots of beast guns but the UMP stood out,you know why? It was the most used gun so regardless of how good the other guns were, people would rather bitch about what is most used/what kills them most.