(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); Hey guys,

Maybe this thread is useless, maybe this thread is in the wrong forum, but I have a question for you guys:

What would you think about MW3, if it had a MW2 connection?

I'm asking this, because many of you say that MW3 is 100% equal to MW2, but it is in fact MUCH and MUCH worse connection-wise. For example: if you used the FAMAS a lot in MW2, you were better off when being the host (if you weren't the host, 2/3 shots would've hit your opponent instead of 3/3). Now, in MW3, it's not even about being the host; it's about the connection your opponents have. If their connection sucks, then so does yours. For example: I have a 100/100 up/download speed, which should cancel out nearly all problems with a connection, but I still get taken out by someone, who has a 3-bar who is sponging as many bullets as possible. Do they get an advantage over me for having a WORSE connection than me? If so, why did IW implement this into the game? What was wrong with the MW2 connection?

For me, this game feels like MW2 with the connection of Wack Ops (which is why I didn't play WO, uhh, BO).

Just curious about what you guys are thinking about this and also tell me, if you'd think this is possible to achieve.

Thx for reading, hf commenting

This is not an excuse, its a problem in the game which ruins everyone that has a decent connection.

All those who say otherwise are the ones getting crap internet and on the good side of the lag compensation.

Shits real and has ruined mw3 along with the nooby no recoil on guns, support packages and small cluttered maps with horrid spawns.

All these reasons make mw3 the worst cod to date!

I don't know what you're up to, but here we go:

First of all, I am a competitive player; I play pubz no longer than 1 hour a week. That 1 hour that I play my pubz matches, nearly EVERYONE runs Assassin (which is, a 'camp-perk', correct?). Secondly, every knife I take during that match, is 90% of the time a 'commando lunge' because of LAG: He was like 2m away from me and still knifed me while I was shooting at him (while in the killcam, you see that he's only 40cm away from you). Cause: LAG. Your third argument about 'us' trying to find excuses, being the overpowered weapons. In my opinion, there is ONE way overpowered weapon and ONE slightly overpowered (respectively the Akimbo FMG9 and Type 95). Most people just run around with their SECONDARY because they KNOW it is overpowered. Now you can say: counter it, use them yourselves. But no, I won't lower myself to those who need overpowered weapons to get kills. I'll stick to my UMP/PP90M1. Also, if you compare THIS game to MW2, you find out that this is a TRUE SMG game; only 1 AR can stand up the Type 95, which is the ACR. All SMG's can even out-class the AR's (for example: UMP versus CM901 = Win for UMP). Finally, your last argument is about the k/d. Most people who have a high k/d can be found camping in corners, waiting for their killstreaks to build up and kill some poor miserable players who 'all of a sudden' show up in the crosshairs of our 'good k/d' player. Your example of Domination is also one of the reasons why it got removed out of the Decerto Ruleset: having a 2-cap the entire game and then camp it out wasn't considered to be 'skilled'. Apparently, you think it is skill to camp 10 minutes in a game to win it. I agree; it is skill to win it, but not with camping it for over 2/3 of the game.

Not all players find 'fake' excuses: they're all true.

---------- Post added at 10:50 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 AM ----------



That's true, but it's not the point I'm aiming at. My point isn't for the physical in-game lag, it's about the bullet lag. You can have video-lag, in which your screen stutters etc etc, but I'm targeting the bullet-lag: firing an entire clip in an enemy, getting the first 3 shots in, and then he still kills you (without failing your aim, that is).

I Actually agreed with the thread topic. My other response was replying to ANOTHER user. The OP doesn't know how replies or groaning works... Smh



LMAO...My previous post had NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU. I was replying to what someone else in this thread said about accountability. I actually agreed with your take on lag and how MW2 connection would be better. You should learn how quoting and replyin to someone works and you also should learn what groaning is for.

I wasn't directing my previous post at you nor was I discrediting your thread.. However, now I will address you

Also you playing competitive isn't all that big of a deal because I'm sure you alter the game so it plays the way you see fit. You probably should stay out of pub matches. Stay in your bubble where you can make all the rules. Otherwisw go grab The Michael Jackson experience on Wii... I LOVE playing against people like you.

Even if you 'didn't address your post against me', you still mentioned CoD players finding 'excuses'. In fact, lag is considered an excuse, so it wasn't that unlikely that I felt that you were talking to me. As for my competitive playing; I don't make the rules, that's what the Rules Council does. We alter the game the way it should be altered; no overpowered guns and no game-modes with ridiculous spawns. So for your comment on my 'competitive play'; you're wrong.

I'll excuse myself for being somewhat rude on my comment on which I thought you commented to me (still get it ?).

I never said those things were untrue. All I said is COD players pretend every death they have is only because of lag, camper,perk,"OP" gun.

If in the guy's killcam you're not moving, then you're a camper even though maybe the guy saw you on his UAV or soundwhored you a couple yards away.

If a guy rushes, then he only killed you because his gun was OP(as if tat guy is the only one with access to this special gun)

I'm not denying issues but COD players will take any issue and exaggerate it. I HATE lag compensation and getting killed around a damn corner. It's still not something that occurs EVERY death.

I will admit I think the "OP" gun arguments are usually pretty stupid. There is always going to be a gun that excels in a certain place. Most players learn how to use other guns to their advantage or if a gun is FAMAS from BO style powerful,they'll just use it too.

Porter, so you address more people than him. I think over 20 percent (pure guess) easy. And no, we won't stay out of public matches. We will keep owning people LIKE you, too big, to find a proper counter fact for anything. We will do it even when struggling with ridicolous lag compesation, which renders this game as unable to play most of the games.

One thing.

COD Lag Warfare 3 was made for CASUAL PLAYERS. Made for MONEY. Robert Bowling said "COD is no longer for hardcore players" - reading between the lines, "We make money, so stop complaining about lag, stupid attachments and now even a stealth bomber in support package". So every noob can feel good when reaching his 9th kill (followed by 28th death) and getting stealth bomber, ruining my killstreak just one kill before beloved Pavelow.

On the other side, i might play some other games more now, and a few matches in MW3. And it used to be other way round. Thanks IW for raping COD community HC players in the arse. Backsmasher challenge completed.

[english is my third language, sorry for any mistakes]