(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
As we all know mw3 survival mode has now got death barriers in , i personally think this is a stupid idea as infected meant mainly exploring/searching the map for me.But some may argue that its a good thing because it stops camping and "Hard to get to places". Do you think it has ruined infected?
Having the death barriers will really stop people who are infected from rage quitting. What's the fun in getting killed 50 times by people with Striker's in places you can't get to.
But if you hit a death barrier, it shouldn't make you infected :FU:
I definitely agree with the "no death barriers but with throwing knives" because like it was said before, most glitches are stationary spots. Throwing knives can easily counter that.
Well this is how I see it, they should have done 1 of two things;
1. Do not put in death barriers, but add in throwing knives.
or
2. Put in death barriers, but do not add the throwing knives.
but it used to be Put in death barriers, but do not add the throwing knives bro after they started blocking them selfs away from the knifes using a friend thats when they addid the throwing knife :y:
Honestly, I think it's retarded to have death barriers. After all, stupid IW put throwing knives on all infected maps. Like the top post said, it's always the infected team that wins.
The UAV at the final survivor is also gay. Unless you get Assassin or Specialist Bonus and go hide in a spot that no one will most likely look in.
Having the death barriers will really stop people who are infected from rage quitting. What's the fun in getting killed 50 times by people with Striker's in places you can't get to.
But if you hit a death barrier, it shouldn't make you infected :FU:
All of this because of you storm GTFO
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
:carling:
The following user thanked LuckyAiden for this useful post: