(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); I finally know COD's main problem, the gun damage is far to high, seriously think about if rvery gun kills in 2-3 shots theres no need to really choice anything but accuracy,

i think this game would be 100% better is every gun except shotguns and snipers, took 5-7 EXTRA bullets to kill on top of what they are now.

This would be more skill based and make shotguns and snipers more in place with the game instead of, its better if your in a small situation and then its only what 1-2? Bullets or 0.5 of a second less or extra time to kill?

Do you think COD would be better without the stupid OP damamge?

I actually think Core takes sometimes to long to kill someone, which is why I play HC sometimes but then I feel HC is sometimes to OP. Someone can just turn around and shoot randomly and hit you without knowing you're there. But I do think they need to find a balance of the to and have that be the damage for both HC and Core and just leave HCs HUD the same with nothing really showing. I wouldn't mind that.

So you would prefer for snipers and shotguns to be one shot kills and assault rifles and smg's even longer to kill ? No thanks.

Everyone who Moans at mw3 says about how Unrealistic It etc and now your suggesting the main problem is that it's too realistic? :dumb:
It shouldn't take that long to kill someone.

guns are not overpowered.
if anything, this game needs stopping power back.
yes it takes 3-4 shots to kill someone,
but not every bullet shot hits the opponent.
next time you kill someone, reload and see how many bullets you actually used.

5-7 extra bullets making an average of let's say 8. 8/30 bullets is pretty expensive and at a lengthy time at 800 RMP. Let's take a shotgun with Focus run at you while you try to mow him down with 8 bullets.

This thread is soooo true <3

Give me a realistic shotgun then, so i one shot from 100 meters away not 10M otherwise explain how 0.5 second justifis using something that works only 50% of the time?

---------- Post added at 09:23 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:20 PM ----------



Hence the reason you would keep your distance and not run in constanly?

And also incase you didnt know 600 RPM is 10 bullets a second so if you carnt aim on the guy for 1 Second you should die.

It's a game. Either play it or leave it.

Just to justify

The model 1887 will mostly kill upto 12M yes i cam shoot further but thats unreliabe distances, so its unfair for a gun that will kill a person from only 12M to be more than 0.5 seconds beter than a gum with unlimited range?