I know the cool thing to do is to use hyperbole in association with COD4. I will say this,
COD4 was the best Call of Duty but MW2 was the more fun Call of Duty. I personally enjoy MW2 much more than COD4 only because Harrier, Pavelows, AC 130s were very fun to use. It's almost like how you choose the filthy slut over the pretty, smart, good girl :carling:
COD4 was great for his time however a Noobtubeless MW2 is probably better than COD4...
Modern Warfare 3 suffers from being the latest game we can hate on. It's not a bad game at all really but we've been playing the same game series over 5 years so the series itself is getting stale. I'd give MW3 7.5/10 mostly because Deathstreaks and Support are just terrible.
Originally posted by DeaDLy
i think he meant the osprey gunners that stay around for a minute & a 1/2
I doubt that is what he meant. People used Support killstreaks way more than Assault, and how many actual Osprey Gunners have you ever seen called in? I'd say maybe 1 Osprey Gunner every 25-30 games usually from care packages. It is a very good killstreak but the fact that it takes 18 points makes it harder for most people to obtain and it is way too easy to shoot down so it's honestly not worth the hassle.
MW3 doesn't feature any OP killstreaks besides Stealth Bomber and EMP since any scrub can get those but I don't really agree with words like "overpowered" anyway.
My main point was MW3 has Spawn protection, Blind Eye, Support and rewards people for shooting down killstreaks so there really is no way to consider them overpowered. I have gold titles for Pred,Attack Heli, AC-130 and Pavelow(they need one for Reaper) and I can tell you that the killstreaks are good but are far from OP. They aren't MW2 level of power.