(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); What do you think is better.

Call of Duty 4 or Call of Duty world at war

Cod4!...Cod5= Hot Garbage

Call of Duty 4 Modern Warfare all the way baby!!

Thats what I'm talking about. Modern Warfare and World at Wars campaign are about the same. Both of them have a good story and gameplay is fun at all levels. World at War has the advantage though because it has something Modern Wafare does not and thats the addition of Campagin Co-Op. World at War also has another HUGE feature that Modern Warfare does not and thats an additional mini-game in Nazi Zombies. As a online multyplayer Modern Warfare in my opinion is far better than World at War. In all, both games singleplayer has high replay value. You can play it over and over and its still fun! I rarely play World at War's multiplayer anymore but I still play Modern Warfare to this day! I bought the game when it came out and still havent put it down.

cod4 all the way

COD4 all the way because WAW took ideas from MW

I get bored with CoD 4.. CoD5 is always fun..

WaW sucks and can't even compete with CoD4.

cod4 but zombies is awesome and its gd to just go play when cod4 gets frustrating

cod4 treyarch = fail