Post: MealTime Application
Options
07-18-2013, 04:30 AM
#1
TheUnexpected
im gay
MealTime
Well, I saw You must login or register to view this content.'s You must login or register to view this content. and I liked what he had made so I recreated it but in C++.
Credits to You must login or register to view this content. for the original idea
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
Again, credits to You must login or register to view this content. for the original idea.
Not working?
- It seems you must be missing the C++ Redistributable Package, take your pick
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content.
You must login or register to view this content. | You must login or register to view this content.
- False positive (either trust me or don't, I don't care).
07-21-2013, 06:49 AM
#20
Complete Speed
Do a barrel roll!
Originally posted by Jake625
microsoft doesn't have a version of C++ lol. They have a managed wrapper..
the type "versions" of C++ are 98 and 11.
managed and unmanged.
the type "versions" of C++ are 98 and 11.
managed and unmanged.
i am pretty sure that when he says versions he's just referring to c++ and visual c++. but either way. c++ used to be my language of choice. java has now peaked my interest. as i'm working on making apps. either way to OP... good job? on posting something in c++ from java. as well as i don't understand how using my base idea(that was already in functional code) and rewriting it in c++ makes it yours but i either way. enjoy.
The following 2 users say thank you to Complete Speed for this useful post:
07-21-2013, 08:10 AM
#21
Jakes625
Guest
Originally posted by Complete
i am pretty sure that when he says versions he's just referring to c++ and visual c++. but either way. c++ used to be my language of choice. java has now peaked my interest. as i'm working on making apps. either way to OP... good job? on posting something in c++ from java. as well as i don't understand how using my base idea(that was already in functional code) and rewriting it in c++ makes it yours but i either way. enjoy.
Yes, but visual C++ is managed. Just correcting on terms. :p
07-21-2013, 05:06 PM
#22
Pichu
PICHU.
PICHU.
Originally posted by Jake625
microsoft doesn't have a version of C++ lol. They have a managed wrapper..
the type "versions" of C++ are 98 and 11.
managed and unmanged.
the type "versions" of C++ are 98 and 11.
managed and unmanged.
Originally posted by Complete
i am pretty sure that when he says versions he's just referring to c++ and visual c++. but either way. c++ used to be my language of choice. java has now peaked my interest. as i'm working on making apps. either way to OP... good job? on posting something in c++ from java. as well as i don't understand how using my base idea(that was already in functional code) and rewriting it in c++ makes it yours but i either way. enjoy.
I am meaning exactly that. Microsoft has their own implementation and they have it modified so technically it's visual C++ and C++; C++ being the original version while visual C++ being an adoption by Microsoft.
07-21-2013, 05:53 PM
#23
Jakes625
Guest
Originally posted by Pichu
I am meaning exactly that. Microsoft has their own implementation and they have it modified so technically it's visual C++ and C++; C++ being the original version while visual C++ being an adoption by Microsoft.
ehh true... but I mean It's still the same C++. ^ = * , you can still typedef, define, new = gcnew. Pretty much all around the same thing, syntax is a little altered but other than that it's just a bunch of namespace pre-defined by the .net framework.
It just makes more sense referencing it as managed and unmanaged. You can call it what you want though.
07-21-2013, 06:13 PM
#24
Pichu
PICHU.
PICHU.
Originally posted by Jake625
ehh true... but I mean It's still the same C++. ^ = * , you can still typedef, define, new = gcnew. Pretty much all around the same thing, syntax is a little altered but other than that it's just a bunch of namespace pre-defined by the .net framework.
It just makes more sense referencing it as managed and unmanaged. You can call it what you want though.
It just makes more sense referencing it as managed and unmanaged. You can call it what you want though.
Yea, well I'm still learning C++ and there is about 5 different ways to call them when explaining differently, especially their true names.
Visual C++ and C++ seem to be the easiest to state as you assume Microsoft w/ Visual. Either way, it works.
07-21-2013, 06:15 PM
#25
Jakes625
Guest
Originally posted by Pichu
Yea, well I'm still learning C++ and there is about 5 different ways to call them when explaining differently, especially their true names.
Visual C++ and C++ seem to be the easiest to state as you assume Microsoft w/ Visual. Either way, it works.
Visual C++ and C++ seem to be the easiest to state as you assume Microsoft w/ Visual. Either way, it works.
Oh and honestly if you're beginning to learn C++, please Learn native (unmanaged) C++. I really recommend it. Also learn basic C functions. They are very helpful, don't bother with "Visual C++" till later. Trust me :y:
07-21-2013, 06:19 PM
#26
Pichu
PICHU.
PICHU.
Originally posted by Jake625
Oh and honestly if you're beginning to learn C++, please Learn native (unmanaged) C++. I really recommend it. Also learn basic C functions. They are very helpful, don't bother with "Visual C++" till later. Trust me :y:
I'm learning unmanaged first, Ivor Hortons Visual C++; he goes into all the different types that Microsoft offers as well as the different ways to create builds in unmanaged C++.
It's really good but confusing at first since I'm having to understand and differentiate from one another so when I start using one from memory, I get confused and write code that doesn't work. It's getting better and the method is teaching my brain to separate the code as if it is its own language so that I can then separate what I learn into the different types.
Been lacking for the last month but what I've learned has actually stuck.
07-21-2013, 07:45 PM
#27
Jakes625
Guest
Originally posted by Pichu
I'm learning unmanaged first, Ivor Hortons Visual C++; he goes into all the different types that Microsoft offers as well as the different ways to create builds in unmanaged C++.
It's really good but confusing at first since I'm having to understand and differentiate from one another so when I start using one from memory, I get confused and write code that doesn't work. It's getting better and the method is teaching my brain to separate the code as if it is its own language so that I can then separate what I learn into the different types.
Been lacking for the last month but what I've learned has actually stuck.
It's really good but confusing at first since I'm having to understand and differentiate from one another so when I start using one from memory, I get confused and write code that doesn't work. It's getting better and the method is teaching my brain to separate the code as if it is its own language so that I can then separate what I learn into the different types.
Been lacking for the last month but what I've learned has actually stuck.
haha yeah. You can switch between managed/unmanaged with
#pragma managed(push, off)
etc.
07-21-2013, 07:57 PM
#28
Master Ro
I make food
Originally posted by TheUnexpected
I can read it, only dumb asses can't read my code. As I stated above I was in a rush. I don't try to please people with stuff I post, either people can hate or enjoy it. Simple as that. lol
Of course most people can read it, but as Pichu said, it takes much more effort to read it than it would if you would put more effort into designing your code.
Copyright © 2026, NextGenUpdate.
All Rights Reserved.
