(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
This is a fairly simple question, and I don't think it'll cause me any trouble as I'm pretty confident everything will be fine.
So, I'll try to keep this short. I have a computer, currently running Windows 7. Said computer has two hard drives. Not one hard drive & two partitions on the table, two physical hard drives. Let's call one 'HDD A', and the other 'HDD B'. HDD A is 1TB in size, is
not partitioned, and has Windows 7 installed on it. HDD B is 1.5tb in size, also
not partitioned, and is currently blank. Well, it has a few files on it, but it will be formatted shortly.
I want to install Kali Linux on HDD B, and leave HDD A
completely untouched, or at least as untouched as practically possible. I'm fairly familiar with Linux, and I know that it will want me to install the Grub boot loader to the master boot record. The only issue is, I have only ever installed Linux, and then Windows, not the other way around.
So on to the actual question: Will installing the Grub bootloader for a Linux installation on HDD B, affect the master boot record for the entire system, or just the boot record for HDD B?
I think I'll be fine, and I should just be able to chose which HDD to boot from the boot menu & BIOS, but could it potentially affect my Windows 7 bootloader on HDD A, leading to a potential f***-up? I always back my files up before doing anything like this, I'd just like to not have to re install Windows, again.