(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); RIght guys is there a difference between an IF, MOTM, UP and Regular. There is a Robin Van Persie IF2 and UP Rated 88. Now the average price for the UP is 45k and the IF2 is 95k. . . . THe stats are the same for both so is there any point in paying more than twice as much? And what about MOTM's there are two Downing MOTM's with the same stats? IS there a sort of supremacy ie MOTMS are better than IF's or anything? I mean UP's cost the least compared to IF's and MOTMS and have the same stats? Any help here please.

Only for the color and rarity, not better.

I have no idea why people would buy these IFs like Suarez and Benzema that are the same as their UP. Unless you feel confident flipping the card, I would not buy the IF.

Just for the cool colour.

Let me explain i will use Van Persie for this scenario
Van Persie 1st card was a regular gold 86
He did something cool and he got an IF
However, EA realized that Van Persie stats did not match his preformance so they gave him an upgrade

So basically as we know the best Van Persie is TOTS Van Persie, However, to solve your question easily. His 86 card is the cheapest, however, some people say that A card that is IF Preforms better than a UP (if they have the same stats), it is a mental thing , like saying thermal on MW3 gives you more bullet damage. The Price on an IF is more because of the fact that is rare and appealing.

You make sense